An insurance paradox
Purpose – To consider why the law of large numbers does not play a more significant role in determining an insurer's financial leverage. Design/methodology/approach – Insurer-group data show that there is little relationship between an insurer's premium volume and its overall leverage (i.e. net written premium-to-surplus ratio). An explanation is sought for the lack of a positive scale effect by considering concomitant negative scale effects. Findings – It is argued that insurers frequently convert the benefits of the law of large numbers into economic subsidies for expanded writings that include poorer risks. Originality/value – The editorial identifies and explores a significant scale phenomenon in the insurance sector that is generally overlooked.
Volume (Year): 7 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK|
Web: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=jrf Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jrfpps:v:7:y:2006:i:2:p:113-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Louise Lister)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.