IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Asset and liability management in financial crisis

  • Arzu Tektas
  • E. Nur Ozkan-Gunay
  • Gokhan Gunay

Purpose – An efficient asset-liability management requires maximizing banks' profit as well as controlling and lowering various risks. This multi-objective decision problem aims to reach goals such as maximization of liquidity, revenue, capital adequacy, and market share subject to financial, legal requirements and institutional policies. This paper models asset and liability management (ALM) in order to show how different managerial strategies affect the financial wellbeing of banks during crisis. Design/methodology/approach – A goal programming model is developed and applied to two medium-scale Turkish commercial banks with distinct risk-taking behavior. This article brings new evidence on the performance of emerging market banks with different managerial philosophies by comparing asset-liability management in crisis. Findings – The study has shown how shifts in market perceptions can create trouble during crisis, even if objective conditions have not changed. Originality/value – The proposed model can provide optimal forecasts of asset-liability components and banks' financial standing for different risk-taking strategies under various economic scenarios. This may facilitate the preparation of contingency plans and create a competitive advantage for bank decision makers.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:;jsessionid=6BC51430D89C38B836D8F85F203FC2BD?contentType=Article&contentId=1465165
Download Restriction: Cannot be freely downloaded

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Emerald Group Publishing in its journal Journal of Risk Finance.

Volume (Year): 6 (2005)
Issue (Month): 2 (March)
Pages: 135-149

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eme:jrfpps:v:6:y:2005:i:2:p:135-149
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK
Web: Email:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jrfpps:v:6:y:2005:i:2:p:135-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Louise Lister)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.