Court of Appeal rules on solicitor's liability to make redress to investors
Purpose – To report on the appeal by the defendants – a firm of sollcitors – against the proceedings taken by the Financial Services Authority. Design/methodology/approach – Outlines the facts and explains the decision. Findings – Finds that this decision serves to illustrate how difficult and fine-turned a task it is to achieve in law effective yet fair transition between one complex regulatory regime with another that is not precisely identical in terms of its intended effects and application. Originality/value – Shows a reason why the level of enthusiasm for much more radical substantive legislative change in the FSMA 2000 framework is relatively muted on the part of Government, regulator and industry alike.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 14 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK|
Web: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=jfrc Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:14:y:2006:i:2:p:210-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Louise Lister)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.