Micro-finance: a critique
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to shed critical light on micro-finance. Design/methodology/approach – This scheme is managed from an economic perspective. Findings – Micro-finance comes to us as a left wing attack on the free enterprise system; as such, it ought to be opposed by all freedom lovers, at least in its present format. Other baggage weighing it down is, if not absolute fraud, then, what might well be considered at least serious chicanery. A further criticism is the cult-like behavior now surrounding it. However, is micro-finance per se necessarily fraudulent? Can it only be favored by critics of laissez faire capitalism? What of micro-finance shorn of all such encumbrances? Should it then be supported? No. Even the Platonic Ideal of micro-finance has serious difficulties. This claim is a matter of prudential judgment, not praxeology. But, even a pure-as-the-driven-snow variety of this scheme still violates the economic concepts of specialization and division of labor, an appreciation of the infant industry fallacy, and several other basic building blocks of the dismal science. There are other better ways to “cure poverty” than this misbegotten scheme. This one, paradoxically, exacerbates impoverishment by placing investment resources in hands less capable of making it grow than would otherwise be the case. Practical implications – It would be unwise to invest in or support this scheme. Social implications – Society should instead rely upon free enterprise banking, the occupy movement to the contrary notwithstanding. Originality/value – It takes a minority position on this very popular institution. JEL classification: D14, G2, R51.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 28 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK|
Web: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/h.htm Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:humpps:v:28:y:2012:i:2:p:92-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.