IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Bankruptcy reform and the effects on chapter 12 bankruptcy for farmers (and fishermen)

  • Neil E. Harl
Registered author(s):

    The United States Constitution assures debtors a right to relief from creditors seeking to satisfy claims against debtors unable to pay their debts. For well over a century, farmers as debtors have enjoyed a favored status by being exempt from involuntary bankruptcy. The landmark 2005 bankruptcy legislation continues that favored status even though the thrust of most of the rest of the 2005 law tightens the rules for non-farm debtors in several significant respects. The 2005 bankruptcy amendments made Chapter 12 bankruptcy for family farmers a permanent part of the Bankruptcy Code, relaxed the rules on family farmers eligible to file for Chapter 12 bankruptcy relief, and created an innovative way to treat tax liability from liquidation of business assets. The contrast in Congressional treatment of farm debtors and non-farm debtors in the 2005 statute is striking and appears to be attributable to strong and effective political support from farm state Members of Congress, the widespread belief that farmers in financial difficulty are deserving of assistance, and that abuse of the bankruptcy system has been less of a problem with the agricultural sector.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:;jsessionid=43AE8F21925462C6AD91A4975FB7E4CD?contentType=Article&contentId=1784576
    Download Restriction: Cannot be freely downloaded

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Emerald Group Publishing in its journal Agricultural Finance Review.

    Volume (Year): 66 (2006)
    Issue (Month): 1 (May)
    Pages: 7-16

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:66:y:2006:i:1:p:7-16
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK
    Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:66:y:2006:i:1:p:7-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Louise Lister)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.