Private social, ethical and environmental disclosure
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine the extent to which social, ethical and environmental (SEE) disclosure is being integrated into institutional investment. The aim is also to investigate the interplay between private and public SEE disclosure. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a grounded theory methodology involving interviews with 21 members of the UK institutional adjustment community. Findings – The paper found that institutional investors did not consider that public SEE disclosure was adequate for their portfolio investment decisions, suggesting that SEE disclosure was decision-useful. Consequently, this perceived market failure in public SEE disclosure has been supplemented by the development of sophisticated private SEE disclosure channels. Further, the interviews indicated that this private SEE disclosure process was becoming dialogic in nature, since not only were institutional investors initiating the engagement process with companies but also companies were starting to request information on the SEE disclosure required by institutional investors. This finding contrasts with previous work which found that the private disclosure process in financial reporting was essentially user-oriented and uni-directional. Originality/value – This paper highlights the importance of SEE disclosure to a crucial user group, institutional investors. The research contributes to the SEE disclosure literature by revealing details of the evolving private SEE disclosure process for the first time.
Volume (Year): 19 (2006)
Issue (Month): 4 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.emeraldinsight.com |
|Order Information:|| Postal: Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK|
Web: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=aaaj Email:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Aris Solomon & Jill Solomon, 1999. "Empirical Evidence of Long-Termism and Shareholder Activism in UK Unit Trusts," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), pages 288-300, 07.
- Akerlof, George A, 1970. "The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500, August.
- Belkaoui, Ahmed, 1980. "The impact of socio-economic accounting statements on the investment decision: An empirical study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 263-283, July.
- Buzby, Stephen L. & Falk, Haim, 1978. "A survey of the interest in social responsibility information by mutual funds," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 3(3-4), pages 191-201, October.
- Core, John E., 2001. "A review of the empirical disclosure literature: discussion," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 441-456, September.
- Acland, Derek, 1976. "The effects of behavioural indicators on investor decisions: An exploratory study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(2-3), pages 133-142, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:19:y:2006:i:4:p:564-591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Louise Lister)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.