IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/das/njaigs/v4y2024i1p543-555id426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Quality Assurance into MLOps for Reliable ML Systems: Engineering Methods and Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Angelina Kirilash

  • Yuliia Baranetska

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) applications in critical sectors such as healthcare and finance face significant reliability concerns despite advancements in automated development and deployment pipelines. Conventional software quality assurance methods, which focus on code correctness, are insufficient for dynamic ML systems that are susceptible to data drift, bias, and adversarial attacks. This study addresses the fragmented systematic of quality assurance (QA) in machine learning operations (MLOps) by proposing an integrated framework. This framework embeds lifecycle-wide QA modules spanning the data, model, and infrastructure layers into MLOps pipelines, coordinated via continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD). Improved reliability was demonstrated in a financial fraud detection case, as evidenced by fewer production incidents, rapid drift detection, increased fairness scores, and steady accuracy. Therefore, the case study validates that continuous and automated QA in MLOps significantly reduces operational risks and increases trust, thereby posing QA as an indispensable integrated service rather than a post-deployment afterthought for robust and ethical ML systems. We evaluate the framework on a financial-fraud workload over 90 days, contrasting a baseline pipeline without QA and a QA-integrated pipeline. The evaluation tracks fairness score (0–1), drift-detection latency, monthly production incident rate, accuracy stability, and data-validation error rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelina Kirilash & Yuliia Baranetska, 2024. "Integrating Quality Assurance into MLOps for Reliable ML Systems: Engineering Methods and Evidence," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 4(1), pages 543-555.
  • Handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:543-555:id:426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/article/view/426
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:das:njaigs:v:4:y:2024:i:1:p:543-555:id:426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Open Knowledge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://newjaigs.com/index.php/JAIGS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.