The 2010 Merger Guidelines and the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Litigation MulliganÃ¢â‚¬Â: Better Economics but Not (Necessarily) More Clarity Before the Agencies and the Courts
The big development of the new Guidelines is that, read as a whole, they embrace three trends with the potential to make merger work significantly longer and less predictable. Hill Wellford & Gregory Wells (Bingham McCutchen)
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpi:atchrn:10.2.2010:i=5720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lindsay McSweeney)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.