IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Bilateral trade, colonial heritage and common currency arrangement: An Oceanian perspective

  • Laïsa Ro'i
  • Alexandre Sénégas

We reassess the trade impact of common currency arrangements – the Rose effect – on the basis of new empirical evidence stemming from the Oceanian Island Countries. In particular, we investigate how the conjunction of a common colonial heritage and membership in a common currency arrangement can impact bilateral trade. To do this, we use different specifications of the gravity equation over an original panel dataset covering the period from 1980 to 2009. Our results first show that the trade impact of common currency arrangements is much more prominent and significant for country pairs that share a common colonial heritage than for country pairs with distinct former colonizers. Second, while a common colonial heritage does significantly and positively affect trade, whether the underlying country pair is in a common currency arrangement or not, the pro-trade effect of a common colonial heritage is nonetheless enhanced by the existence of such a common currency arrangement. These results suggest, more generally, that further steps towards monetary integration in the zone could not be contemplated without taking historical factors into account.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by CEPII research center in its journal International Economics/Economie Internationale.

Volume (Year): (2012)
Issue (Month): 129 ()
Pages: 63-98

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cii:cepiei:2012-q1-129-3
Contact details of provider: Postal: 113, rue de Grenelle, 75700 Paris SP07
Phone: 33 01 53 68 55 00
Fax: 33 01 53 68 55 01
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepiei:2012-q1-129-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.