IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The speculative efficiency of the aluminum market: A nonlinear Investigation

  • Mohamed El Hedi Arouri
  • Fredj Jawadi
  • Prosper Mouak

This paper studies the speculative efficiency of the aluminum contract traded in the London Metal Exchange over the last three decades. We investigate both short and long-run efficiency using linear and nonlinear cointegration approaches and Error Correction Models (ECM). Our findings point out the following points. First, futures aluminum prices are found to be cointegrated with spot prices and they do not constitute unbiased predictors of future spot prices. Second, the hypothesis of risk neutrality is rejected. Finally, the short-run efficiency hypothesis is rejected and using past futures price returns improves the modeling and forecast of future spot price. Our findings have important implications for producers, arbitrageurs, speculators as well as policymakers. As far as our knowledge allows to remember, this paper is the first attempt to test both linear and nonlinear efficiency for the aluminum market.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by CEPII research center in its journal International Economics/Economie Internationale.

Volume (Year): (2011)
Issue (Month): 126-127 ()
Pages: 73-90

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cii:cepiei:2011-q2-3-126-127-5
Contact details of provider: Postal: 113, rue de Grenelle, 75700 Paris SP07
Phone: 33 01 53 68 55 00
Fax: 33 01 53 68 55 01
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepiei:2011-q2-3-126-127-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.