IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Ostdeutsche Unternehmen betrachten EU-Dienstleistungsrichtlinie mit Skepsis

Listed author(s):
  • Thomas Kiessl
  • Carsten Pohl
  • Heinz Schmalholz

Während sich der Warenverkehr innerhalb der Europäischen Union deutlich intensiviert hat, hängt der EU-weite Austausch im Dienstleistungsbereich noch stark zurück. Als ursächlich hierfür wird die Existenz einer Vielzahl länderspezifischer nicht-tarifärer Hindernisse angesehen, deren Abschaffung durch die Vollendung des EU-Binnenmarktes für Dienstleistungen neue Wachstums- und Beschäftigungspotenziale eröffnen soll. Welche Chancen und Risiken west- und ostdeutsche/sächsische Dienstleistungsunternehmen mit der stärkeren Öffnung der Dienstleistungsmärkte in Europa verbinden, wird in diesem Beitrag nach einer überblicksartigen Einführung in die Thematik mittels der Ergebnisse einer Sonderumfrage des ifo Instituts zur EU-Dienstleistungsrichtlinie dargestellt.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich in its journal ifo Dresden berichtet.

Volume (Year): 13 (2006)
Issue (Month): 01 (02)
Pages: 15-26

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:13:y:2006:i:01:p:15-26
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 München

Phone: +49-89-9224-0
Fax: +49-89-985369
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Henk Kox & Arjan Lejour & Raymond Montizaan, 2004. "The free movement of services within the EU," CPB Document 69, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:13:y:2006:i:01:p:15-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klaus Wohlrabe)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.