IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

‪Des syndicalistes britanniques toujours blacklistés !‪. L’anti-syndicalisme patronal au Royaume-Uni


  • Steve Jefferys


‪Trade union discrimination in the UK takes both direct and indirect forms. British employers, especially family-owned firms, have always preferred trade union-free workplaces. When they had the opportunity they would deny trade unionists jobs, or dismiss them if ‪ ‪“‪ ‪their‪ ‪”‪ ‪ employees joined a union and actively promoted collective worker opposition. Often they maintained blacklists of militants whom they advised other local employers not to recruit. Victimised activists were often forced to change town or occupation to get work. But for over a hundred years, from the 1860s to the 1970s, trade union discrimination was not the dominant employer strategy. Many medium and large-sized British-owned firms tolerated and cooperated with trade unionists. They did so to secure industrial peace, and because they wanted the unions to discipline incoming competitors to their industries. Since the economic slowdown from the 1970s and the hegemony of economic neo-liberalism in a context of higher intensity global competition, trade union discrimination has become more systematic. It includes the direct forms of avoidance and victimisation, but is particularly significant in its indirect forms of marginalisation and legal restraint. Organised ideological anti-unionism was once the preserve of the ideological Economic League and its construction industry blacklisting progeny, The Consulting Association. In 21‪ ‪st‪ ‪ century UK anti-unionism now become a staple part of more sophisticated pragmatic human resource management within an industrial relations legal framework that discriminates strongly against trade union representation and action.‪

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Jefferys, 2016. "‪Des syndicalistes britanniques toujours blacklistés !‪. L’anti-syndicalisme patronal au Royaume-Uni," Revue Tiers-Monde, Armand Colin, vol. 0(2), pages 17-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:rtmarc:te_146_0017

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: restricted

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: restricted

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rtmarc:te_146_0017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.