Portfolio Rebalancing and the Turn-of-the-Year Effect
This paper finds that, for the 1935-86 period, the market's risk-return relation does not have a January seasonal. The findings differ from those of other studies due to the use of value-weighted, rather than equally-weighted, portfolios. Inferences are sensitive to the weighting procedure because of the small-firm return patterns in January. In particular, even in those Januaries for which the market return is negative, small-firm returns are positive, and they are more positive the higher is beta. This is consistent with the portfolio rebalancing explanation of the turn-of-the-year effect. Copyright 1989 by American Finance Association.
Volume (Year): 44 (1989)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.afajof.org/|
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:1:p:149-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.