Rational Actor Theory in Politics: A Critical Review of John Quiggin
John Quiggin's paper attacks public-choice theory, among other things, for its use of the assumption of "rational egoism." The object of the authors' response is twofold. First, to disting uish egoism from rationality and to indicate that rationality postula tes, when faithfully applied, provide reasons for believing that poli tical behavior and market behavior will be systematically different. Second, to indicate that comparative static propositions in public-ch oice theory can be sustained on rather weaker behavioral assumptions than homo economicus embodies, and that consequently some of the publ ic-choice orthodoxy would survive any attack on the egoism assumption Copyright 1987 by The Economic Society of Australia.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 63 (1987)
Issue (Month): 180 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: 61 3 9497 4140
Fax: 61 3 9497 4140
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0013-0249
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0013-0249|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:63:y:1987:i:180:p:22-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.