IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v55y1988i218p235-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ration Subsidies and Incentives in the Pre-reform Chinese Commune

Author

Listed:
  • Putterman, Louis

Abstract

A central feature of the "egalitarianism" said to have undermined work incentives in Chinese agricultural produ ction teams during the 1960s and 1970s was the distribution of grain rations independently of work contribution. This paper analyzes two m odels of grain rationing, one drawn from existing theoretical literat ure and the other perhaps more closely based on Chinese practice. It finds that a scheme of the type commonly depicted was more costly to operate but provided better incentives to labor-poor households. Unde r both schemes, however, the scope for material incentives was reduce d by grain ration guarantees, and was smaller the poorer the team. Copyright 1988 by The London School of Economics and Political Science.

Suggested Citation

  • Putterman, Louis, 1988. "Ration Subsidies and Incentives in the Pre-reform Chinese Commune," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 55(218), pages 235-247, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:55:y:1988:i:218:p:235-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0427%28198805%292%3A55%3A218%3C235%3ARSAIIT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Dabai, 1990. "Plan and market(s): a theoretical model of the Chinese grain economy," ISU General Staff Papers 1990010108000010424, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Zhun Xu, 2015. "The Achievements, Contradictions and Demise of the Rural Collectives in Songzi County, China," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(2), pages 339-365, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:55:y:1988:i:218:p:235-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.