IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojtjap/v8y2025i2p46-70id3274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating Constraint: A Review on the Role of Participatory Governance in Addressing Agricultural Challenges and Enhancing Resilience in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Patrishia Joy F. Reytana

  • Hwa Seok Hwang

  • Byung Wook Yun

Abstract

Purpose: This report seeks to provide a comprehensive examination of participatory governance’s specific role, observed impacts, and the persistent barriers to its effective implementation within the unique Philippine agricultural context. Methodology: This systematic literature review used a content analysis with a thematic synthesis. It examined a wide range of papers from government records, industry analyses, peer-reviewed articles, and research reviews that were pertinent to the particulars of participatory governance in the Philippine agricultural context. Findings: Participatory governance serves as a critical but underutilized pathway to resilience in Philippine agriculture. Case studies of farmer field schools, irrigation management, seed governance, and organic certification demonstrate how inclusive, farmer-led approaches foster adaptive capacity, sustainability, and equity. However, persistent barriers including institutional rigidity, entrenched power imbalances, weak policy implementation, socio-political disempowerment, and organizational weaknesses at the grassroots level continue to limit its transformative potential despite supportive laws and frameworks. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: This report contributes to theory by framing participatory governance as a pathway not only to recovery but also to adaptive and transformative resilience, enriched by indigenous Filipino concepts of collective governance. In practice, it highlights concrete mechanisms and challenges that inform farmer organizations, NGOs, and development actors seeking to operationalize participatory approaches. For policy, it underscores the need to move beyond declarative frameworks toward genuine implementation that strengthens institutional capacity, addresses structural inequities, and embeds accountability, positioning participatory governance as both a political and technical imperative for agricultural transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrishia Joy F. Reytana & Hwa Seok Hwang & Byung Wook Yun, 2025. "Navigating Constraint: A Review on the Role of Participatory Governance in Addressing Agricultural Challenges and Enhancing Resilience in the Philippines," Journal of Agricultural Policy, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 46-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjap:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:46-70:id:3274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://carijournals.org/journals/JAP/article/view/3274
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Kaufmann & Nikolaus Hruschka & Christian R. Vogl, 2020. "Bridging the Literature Gap: A Framework for Assessing Actor Participation in Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2023. "How to boost the local trade of participatory guarantee system (PGS)-certified produce? A value chain perspective in Huánuco, Peru," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Wenguang Ge & Xinyu Bai & Zheng Zhang & Qianqian Gao, 2022. "The Impact of Consumer Participation Certification on the Trust of Eco-Agricultural Products Based on the Mediating Effects of Information and Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Sonja Kaufmann & Nikolaus Hruschka & Luis Vildozo & Christian R. Vogl, 2023. "Alternative Food Networks in Latin America—exploring PGS (Participatory Guarantee Systems) markets and their consumers: a cross-country comparison," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 193-216, March.
    4. Biancamaria Torquati & Sergio Pedini & Fabio Maria Santucci & Riccardo Da Re, 2021. "Participatory Guarantee System and Social Capital for Sustainable Development in Brazil: The Case Study of OPAC Orgânicos Sul de Minas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. April M. Roggio & Jason R. Evans, 2022. "Will Participatory Guarantee Systems Happen Here? The Case for Innovative Food Systems Governance in the Developed World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjap:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:46-70:id:3274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://carijournals.org/journals/JAP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.