IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Public Expenditure And Economic Growth In Nigeria

Listed author(s):
  • Usman.A

    (Department of Economics, University of Ilorin,Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Mobolaji H. I

    (Department of Economics, University of Ilorin,Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Kilishi A.A

    (Department of Economics, University of Ilorin,Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Yaru M. A

    (Department of Economics, University of Ilorin,Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Yakubu, T. A

    (Department of Economics, University of Ilorin,Ilorin, Nigeria)

Registered author(s):

    The debate on the use of fiscal policy for economic stabilization and inducement of economic growth is an old one. Key issue in this debate relates to the efficacy of public expenditure on stimulating economic growth. The neo-classical school held on extreme position by refuting the usage of fiscal policy to regulate the economy even in the time of economic crisis. At the other extreme are those who emphasize the efficiency of fiscal policy in stabilizing economic fluctuations and stimulating growth. There is nearly a consensus on the short-run effects of fiscal policy on the economy. Fiscal policy can temporarily raise or lower national income or counteract macroeconomic disturbances that would otherwise influence national output. This paper contributes to this debate by investigating the effect of federal government expenditure on economic growth in Nigeria. An augmented Solow model is specified in Cobb-Douglas form with public capital as one of the factors. Public expenditure is used as proxy for public capital which is further decomposed by sectors. This helps us to investigate the impact of each sector on economic growth. The decomposition is in three expenditure streams: (i) expenditure on building human capital- public expenditure on education and health; (ii) expenditure on building infrastructure- public expenditure on transport and communication, and other social services; and (iii) expenditure on administration which is necessary for the functioning of government; A multivariate time series framework is used. Augmented Dickey- Fuller test indicated that two of the variables are stationary at first difference while other variables are stationary at levels. While Phillips Peron tests show that three are stationary at levels and others at first difference. Results of the regressions show that in the short run public spending has no impact on growth. However, Cointegration and VEC results show that there is long run relationship between public expenditure and growth.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Asian Economic and Social Society in its journal Asian Economic and Financial Review.

    Volume (Year): 1 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 3 (September)
    Pages: 104-113

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:2011:p:104-113
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Sadeeq Block, Near Fawara Chowk, Abbasia Town, Rahim Yar Khan - 64200, Punjab, Pakistan

    Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Abu-Bader, Suleiman & Abu-Qarn, Aamer S., 2003. "Government expenditures, military spending and economic growth: causality evidence from Egypt, Israel, and Syria," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 25(6-7), pages 567-583, September.
    2. Ward Romp & Jakob de Haan, 2007. "Public Capital and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 8(s1), pages 6-52, 04.
    3. Easterly, William & Rebelo, Sergio, 1993. "Fiscal policy and economic growth: An empirical investigation," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 417-458, December.
    4. M E Haque & D H Kim, 2003. "Public Investment in Transportation and Communication and Growth: A Dynamic Panel Approach," The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 0324, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    5. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Swaroop, Vinaya & Heng-fu, Zou, 1996. "The composition of public expenditure and economic growth," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 313-344, April.
    6. Olivier Blanchard & Roberto Perotti, 2002. "An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 117(4), pages 1329-1368.
    7. Ahmed Badawi, 2003. "Private capital formation and public investment in Sudan: testing the substitutability and complementarity hypotheses in a growth framework," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 783-799.
    8. Christoph Schaltegger & Benno Torgler, 2006. "Growth effects of public expenditure on the state and local level: evidence from a sample of rich governments," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 1181-1192.
    9. Barro, Robert J, 1990. "Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 103-126, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:aeafrj:2011:p:104-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Qazi Muhammad Imran)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.