The Importance of R&D and Innovation for Productivity: A Reexamination in Light of the 2000 French Innovation Survey
This paper consists in a detailed robustness investigation of the Crépon, Duguet and Mairesse  (CDM) econometric framework, which encompasses as a reduced form equation the production function extended to R&D, as pioneered by Zvi Griliches. We focus on the sensitivity of the estimated productivity elasticities of innovation and R&D, with respect to different model specifications and estimation methods, and to the different innovation output quantitative and qualitative indicators available in the 1998-2000 French Community Innovation Survey. The main conclusion we draw is that as long as we properly correct for endogeneity and also, when appropriate, for selectivity, we find again estimates of the productivity elasticities of R&D and of the corresponding median rates of return to R&D, which are close to the usual estimates from the extended Cobb-Douglas production function. We interpret the need to instrument innovation and R&D as revealing important measurement errors in the innovation intensity variables, as well as but to a lesser extent in the innovation binary indicators, the R&D intensity variable and binary indicator. Although innovation surveys unveil interesting information and the CDM model is a good framework, which can both be used to advance our understanding of the firm R&D and innovation activities and performances, much more remains to be done to improve the quality of the data and relevance of the analysis.
Volume (Year): (2005)
Issue (Month): 79-80 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://annales.ensae.fr/Email:
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2005:i:79-80:p:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Robert Gary-Bobo)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.