IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-205656.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evidence and Theory of Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Tito Boeri
  • Carlo Scarpa
  • Lidia Tsyganok
  • Christian Wey
  • Micael Castanheira De Moura
  • Riccardo Faini
  • Vincenzo Galasso
  • Giorgio Barba Navaretti
  • Stéphane Carcillo
  • Jonathan Haskel
  • Giuseppe Nicoletti
  • Enrico Perotti

Abstract

This chapter analyses reform over time across countries and sectors. Four scenarios for reforms are identified. In a scenario characterized by strong concentration of power in the hands of the policy-makers, a reform attempt in markets that do not feature entrenched interests may be carried out by exploiting this political power. Policy-makers lacking a substantial concentration of power can instead adopt a consensus building strategy to reform by tailoring the reform package to widen the political base. In the presence of strong entrenched interests, when some specific groups are both too strong to be confronted at once and too expensive to buy out, policy-makers may adopt a strategy of divide and conquer. In several circumstances, the reform efforts of policy-makers are largely affected by the existence of international laws or regulations that make reforms inescapable. Almost regardless of their political power and of the market or institution to be modified, the policy-maker may exploit these external constraints to carry out the reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Tito Boeri & Carlo Scarpa & Lidia Tsyganok & Christian Wey & Micael Castanheira De Moura & Riccardo Faini & Vincenzo Galasso & Giorgio Barba Navaretti & Stéphane Carcillo & Jonathan Haskel & Giuseppe , 2007. "Evidence and Theory of Reforms," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/205656, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/205656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lidia CERIANI & Raffaele DORONZO & Massimo FLORIO, 2009. "Privatization, unbundling, and liberalization of network industries:a discussion of the dominant policy paradigm in the EU," Departmental Working Papers 2009-09, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/205656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.