IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifofob/124.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Gutachten zum Reformvorschlag „Kindergrundsicherung“

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Joseph Blömer
  • Simon Litsche
  • Andreas Peichl

Abstract

This report examines a reform proposal by the Bündnis 90/Die Grünen to introduce a reformed basic child benefit (Kindergrundsicherung). The aim of the reform proposal is to improve the material situation of families and to simplify the eligibility for benefits. Core elements of the reform proposal include a consolidation of currently various transfers for families into the reformed basic child benefit. To achieve this, the reform proposal disentangles child-related benefits from unemployment benefit II. Furthermore, the concept includes a general increase in the level of benefits in the low and middle income brackets. The reform proposal offers significant improvements in terms of disposable income, especially for families with children in the lower income deciles. This also significantly reduces the risk of poverty. Negative labor supply effects contribute to the high fiscal costs of the reform proposal. When designing the reform proposal, there is room for balancing in the level of a cutoff threshold and a transfer withdrawal rate. The negative work incentives are relatively weaker with a lower transfer withdrawal rate and a higher cutoff.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Joseph Blömer & Simon Litsche & Andreas Peichl, 2021. "Gutachten zum Reformvorschlag „Kindergrundsicherung“," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 124, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifo_Forschungsberichte_124_Kindergrundsicherung.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peichl, Andreas & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2012. "Accounting for labor demand effects in structural labor supply models," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 129-138.
    2. Ulrich Walwei & Werner Eichhorst & Ulf Rinne & Maximilian Blömer & Clemens Fuest & Andreas Peichl & Jürgen Schupp & Gerhard Bäcker, 2019. "Hartz IV — Reform einer umstrittenen politischen Maßnahme [Hartz IV — Reform of a Controversial Political Measure]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(4), pages 235-255, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bargain, Olivier & Orsini, Kristian & Peichl, Andreas, 2011. "Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the US," IZA Discussion Papers 5820, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Thomas Leoni & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2020. "Senkung der Lohnnebenkosten und Finanzierungsvarianten. Bisherige Erkenntnisse und internationale Reformbeispiele," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66851.
    3. Mauro Mastrogiacomo & Nicole M. Bosch & Miriam D. A. C. Gielen & Egbert L. W. Jongen, 2017. "Heterogeneity in Labour Supply Responses: Evidence from a Major Tax Reform," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(5), pages 769-796, October.
    4. Lundberg, Jacob, 2017. "Analyzing tax reforms using the Swedish Labour Income Microsimulation Model," Working Paper Series 2017:12, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    5. Rolf Aaberge & Ugo Colombino, 2018. "Structural Labour Supply Models and Microsimulation," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(1), pages 162-197.
    6. Max Löffler & Andreas Peichl & Nico Pestel & Hilmar Schneider & Sebastian Siegloch, 2011. "Einfach ist nicht immer gerecht : eine Mikrosimulationsstudie der Kirchhof-Reform für die Einkommensteuer," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(4), pages 147-160.
    7. Peichl, Andreas & Popp, Martin, 2022. "Can the Labor Demand Curve Explain Job Polarization?," IAB-Discussion Paper 202221, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    8. Andreas Lichter & Andreas Peichl & Sebastian Siegloch, 2017. "Exporting and labour demand: Micro-level evidence from Germany," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1161-1189, November.
    9. John K. Dagsvik & Zhiyang Jia & Tom Kornstad & Thor O. Thoresen, 2014. "Theoretical And Practical Arguments For Modeling Labor Supply As A Choice Among Latent Jobs," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 134-151, February.
    10. Contini, Bruno & Grand, Elisa, 2014. "Estimating Workforce Disposal in the Italian Labour Market," IZA Policy Papers 79, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Bargain, O. & Herwig Immervoll & Andreas Peichl & Siegloch, S., 2010. "GINI DP 1: Distributional Consequences of Labor-Demand Adjustments to a Downturn. A Model-Based Approach with Application to Germany 2008-09," GINI Discussion Papers 1, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    12. Lorenz, Svenja & Zwick, Thomas & Bruns, Mona, 2022. "Beware of the employer: Financial incentives for employees may fail to prolong old-age employment," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    13. Siegloch, Sebastian, 2014. "Employment Effects of Local Business Taxes," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100325, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Shun-ichiro Bessho & Masayoshi Hayashi, 2015. "Should the Japanese tax system be more progressive? An evaluation using the simulated SMCFs based on the discrete choice model of labor supply," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 22(1), pages 144-175, February.
    15. Henk-Wim Boer, 2018. "A Structural Analysis of Labour Supply and Involuntary Unemployment in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 285-308, September.
    16. Kathmann, Till, 2021. "Gewerkschaftliche Strategien im Niedriglohnsektor: Eine Analyse ihrer Herausforderungen und Gelingensbedingungen," Reihe Arbeit und Wirtschaft in Bremen 33, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeit­nehmer­kammer Bremen.
    17. Nico Pestel & Eric Sommer, 2017. "Shifting Taxes from Labor to Consumption: More Employment and more Inequality?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63(3), pages 542-563, September.
    18. Alpaslan Akay & Olivier Bargain & H. Xavier Jara, 2020. "‘Fair’ welfare comparisons with heterogeneous tastes: subjective versus revealed preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 51-84, June.
    19. Buhlmann, Florian & Kolb, Michael & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2020. "Einführung einer Garantiesicherung: Endbericht," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 230961, June.
    20. Bonomi Bezzo, Franco, 2021. "Universal Independence Income. A EUROMOD Utopian Simulation in the UK," EUROMOD Working Papers EM3/21, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.