IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/teg/journl/v6y2010i2p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High Stakes Accountability and High School Student Perceptions of Instructional Climate: A Longitudinal Trend Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Stichter

Abstract

This longitudinal trend study investigated student satisfaction perceptions of instructional climate in one high school district. The purpose was to probe what students define as instructional climate and whether their perception changed during a decade of expanding emphasis on accountability in California. Archival data from six biennial surveys conducted over 10 years were analyzed using factor analysis to identify a sustained instructional climate factor. Factor loading items were tracked over the six survey cycles for purposes of ascertaining how student satisfaction scale components performed. Findings suggest that as the emphasis on standardized testing and accountability in California was ramped up between 1999 and 2009 student satisfaction levels with instructional climate kept pace. Student perception was that their satisfaction with the instructional climate was improving. Also, student satisfaction with instructional climate appeared to be viewed through the lens of student experience in English and mathematics courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Stichter, 2010. "High Stakes Accountability and High School Student Perceptions of Instructional Climate: A Longitudinal Trend Study," Nonpartisan Education Review, Nonpartisan Education Review, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:6:y:2010:i:2:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v6n2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v6n2.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    education; policy;

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:6:y:2010:i:2:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard P. Phelps (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nonpartisaneducation.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.