IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmkthe/v20y2010i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A market segmentation approach for higher education based on rational and emotional factors

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Angulo
  • Albena Pergelova
  • Josep Rialp

Abstract

Market segmentation is an important topic for higher education administrators and researchers. For segmenting the higher education market, we have to understand what factors are important for high school students in selecting a university. Extant literature has probed the importance of rational factors such as teaching staff, campus facilities, and quality of education. Less attention has been devoted to the relevance of emotional factors such as personal values. The aim of this paper is to suggest a segmentation approach based on integrating rational and emotional factors that prospective students value when selecting a university. We gather information from 21 focus groups and develop a survey applied to a sample of high school students. We find six segments characterized by distinct rational and emotional underlying factors that lead to a particular composition for each segment. The factors discussed in this research can be used as a guide for higher education managers to develop segmentation and communication plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Angulo & Albena Pergelova & Josep Rialp, 2010. "A market segmentation approach for higher education based on rational and emotional factors," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:20:y:2010:i:1:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1080/08841241003788029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08841241003788029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08841241003788029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi & Nathalie Colasanti & Gloria Fiorani, 2019. "Creating Value in the Entrepreneurial University: Marketization and Merchandising Strategies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Angulo-Ruiz, Fernando & Pergelova, Albena & Cheben, Juraj & Angulo-Altamirano, Eladio, 2016. "A cross-country study of marketing effectiveness in high-credence services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3636-3644.
    3. El Nemar, Sam & Vrontis, Demetris & Thrassou, Alkis, 2020. "An innovative stakeholder framework for the Student-Choice Decision making process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 339-353.
    4. Emma Winter & Helen Thompson-Whiteside, 2017. "Location, location, location: does place provide the opportunity for differentiation for universities?," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 233-250, July.
    5. Dora E. Bock & Sonja Martin Poole & Mathew Joseph, 2014. "Does branding impact student recruitment: a critical evaluation," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 11-21, June.
    6. Margaret Mungai & Damiannah Kieti & Isabella Mapelu, 2021. "Tourism education enrolment among Kenyan public universities: Socioeconomic aspects," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 340-348, September.
    7. Zhou, Heng & Norman, Richard & Kelobonye, Keone & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Hughes, Brett & Nikolova, Gabi & Falkmer, Torbjorn, 2020. "Market segmentation approach to investigate existing and potential aviation markets," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 120-135.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:20:y:2010:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/WMHE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.