IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v36y2023i1d10.1007_s11213-022-09596-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Rigor Meets Relevance: the Development of Hybrid Actionable Knowledge Production Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Thomaz Wood

    (FGV EAESP)

  • Edvalter Becker Holz

    (Insper Institute of Education and Research)

  • Renato Souza

    (FGV EAESP)

Abstract

Actionable knowledge (AK) refers to knowledge that is both rigorous and relevant. Previous works have assumed these features to be separate ontological realms and have focused on crafting theories to explain the mechanisms whereby those realms can be bridged to generate AK. Because of this orientation, we call such approaches bridging theories and claim that they have neglected research systems in which rigor and relevance are ontologically mingled. In the present study, we aimed to analyze how rigor and relevance can become ontologically mingled rather than bridged. We adopted hybridism as our ontology and an epistemology grounded in interactive moments featuring knowing-from-within to conduct two inductive, interpretive case studies of the development of research systems in business schools. Based on our findings, we developed a conceptual model to describe the process by which (rigorous) scientific and (relevant) practical knowledge systems are hybridized and become ontologically mingled over time. We introduce the notion of research hybridization and discuss this concept in relation to bridging theories. While bridging theories explain AK generation in terms of the agential role played by collaboration among researchers and contextual stakeholders, research hybridization explains AK in terms of the agential role played by the actions institutionally undertaken in business schools regarding research.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomaz Wood & Edvalter Becker Holz & Renato Souza, 2023. "When Rigor Meets Relevance: the Development of Hybrid Actionable Knowledge Production Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:36:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11213-022-09596-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-022-09596-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-022-09596-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-022-09596-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Graham Astley & Raymond F. Zammuto, 1992. "Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 443-460, November.
    2. Björn Schmitz, 2015. "Beyond Structural Governance," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 241-258, July.
    3. Liesel Carlsson & Edith Callaghan & Göran Broman, 2021. "Assessing Community Contributions to Sustainable Food Systems: Dietitians Leverage Practice, Process and Paradigms," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 575-601, October.
    4. McMullen, Jeffery S., 2018. "Organizational hybrids as biological hybrids: Insights for research on the relationship between social enterprise and the entrepreneurial ecosystem," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 575-590.
    5. Martin Sexton & Shu-Ling Lu, 2009. "The challenges of creating actionable knowledge: an action research perspective," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 683-694.
    6. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170710746337 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Alfred Kieser & Lars Leiner, 2009. "Why the Rigour–Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 516-533, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bullinger, Bernadette & Kieser, Alfred & Schiller-Merkens, Simone, 2015. "Coping with institutional complexity: Responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 437-450.
    2. Robin Fincham & Timothy Clark, 2009. "Introduction: Can We Bridge the Rigour–Relevance Gap?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 510-515, May.
    3. Patel, Shivan Sanjay & Pandey, Shivendra Kumar & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2019. "Revisiting the relevance debate empirically: Historical roots and modern shoots," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 273-283.
    4. Norbert Bol, 2011. "Co-Creation of Value In Real Estate Investments," ERES eres2011_168, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    5. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    6. Jacqueline Fendt, 2013. "Lost in Translation? On Mind and Matter in Management Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, May.
    7. João M. S. Carvalho & Célio A. A. Sousa, 2018. "Is Psychological Value a Missing Building Block in Societal Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Wenzel, Matthias & Will, Matthias Georg, 2019. "The communicative constitution of academic fields in the digital age: The case of CSR," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 517-533.
    9. Kevin Morrell, 2008. "The Narrative of ‘Evidence Based’ Management: A Polemic," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 613-635, May.
    10. Julia Olmos Peñuela & Paul Benneworth & Elena Castro-Martínez, 2018. "Does usable research face higher obstacles within the academy?," CHEPS Working Papers 201805, University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
    11. Jesús de Frutos-Belizón & Fernando Martín-Alcázar & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey, 2021. "The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1465-1515, August.
    12. Syrus M Islam, 2022. "Social impact scaling strategies in social enterprises: A systematic review and research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(2), pages 298-321, May.
    13. Gupta, Nitish & Park, Hyunkyu & Phaal, Rob, 2022. "The portfolio planning, implementing, and governing process: An inductive approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Haider Alvi, Farzad & Ulrich, Klaus, 2023. "Innovation finance ecosystems for entrepreneurial firms: A conceptual model and research propositions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Helene Tenzer & Siri Terjesen & Anne-Wil Harzing, 2017. "Language in International Business: A Review and Agenda for Future Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 815-854, December.
    16. Timothy Clark & Mike Wright, 2009. "So, Farewell Then . . . Reflections on Editing the Journal of Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 1-9, January.
    17. Meglio, Olimpia & Risberg, Annette, 2011. "The (mis)measurement of M&A performance—A systematic narrative literature review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 418-433.
    18. Nazik Beishenaly & Frédéric Dufays, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem for cooperatives: The case of Kyrgyz agricultural cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(4), pages 1173-1198, December.
    19. Eden, Colin & Ackermann, Fran, 2018. "Theory into practice, practice to theory: Action research in method development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1145-1155.
    20. Christopher Wickert & Corinne Post & Jonathan P. Doh & John E. Prescott & Andrea Prencipe, 2021. "Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 297-320, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:36:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11213-022-09596-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.