IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v87y2022i3d10.1007_s11336-021-09833-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rotation in Correspondence Analysis from the Canonical Correlation Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Naomichi Makino

    (Benesse Educational Research and Development Institute)

Abstract

Correspondence analysis (CA) is a statistical method for depicting the relationship between two categorical variables, and usually places an emphasis on graphical representations. In this study, we discuss a CA formulation based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA). In CCA-based formulation, the correlations within and between row/column categories in a reduced dimensional space can be expressed by canonical variables. However, in existing CCA-based formulations, only orthogonal rotation is permitted. Herein, we propose an alternative CCA-based formulation that permits oblique rotation. In the proposed formulation, the CA loss function can be defined as maximizing the generalized coefficient of determination, which is a measure of proximity between two variables. Simulation studies and real data examples are presented in order to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Naomichi Makino, 2022. "Rotation in Correspondence Analysis from the Canonical Correlation Perspective," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1045-1063, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:87:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-021-09833-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-021-09833-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-021-09833-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-021-09833-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Urbano Lorenzo-Seva, 2003. "A factor simplicity index," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 49-60, March.
    2. Robert Jennrich, 2002. "A simple general method for oblique rotation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 7-19, March.
    3. de Leeuw, Jan & Mair, Patrick, 2009. "Simple and Canonical Correspondence Analysis Using the R Package anacor," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 31(i05).
    4. Norman Cliff & David Krus, 1976. "Interpretation of canonical analysis: Rotated vs. unrotated solutions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(1), pages 35-42, March.
    5. Hironori Satomura & Kohei Adachi, 2013. "Oblique Rotaton in Canonical Correlation Analysis Reformulated as Maximizing the Generalized Coefficient of Determination," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 526-537, July.
    6. Michel Velden & Henk A.L. Kiers, 2005. "Rotation in Correspondence Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 22(2), pages 251-271, September.
    7. John Carroll, 1953. "An analytical solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 18(1), pages 23-38, March.
    8. Henk Kiers, 1994. "Simplimax: Oblique rotation to an optimal target with simple structure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 567-579, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hironori Satomura & Kohei Adachi, 2013. "Oblique Rotaton in Canonical Correlation Analysis Reformulated as Maximizing the Generalized Coefficient of Determination," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 526-537, July.
    2. Thomas Despois & Catherine Doz, 2022. "Identifying and interpreting the factors in factor models via sparsity : Different approaches," Working Papers halshs-03626503, HAL.
    3. Thomas Despois & Catherine Doz, 2023. "Identifying and interpreting the factors in factor models via sparsity: Different approaches," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 533-555, June.
    4. Conti, Gabriella & Frühwirth-Schnatter, Sylvia & Heckman, James J. & Piatek, Rémi, 2014. "Bayesian exploratory factor analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 31-57.
    5. Liu, Xinyi Lin & Wallin, Gabriel & Chen, Yunxiao & Moustaki, Irini, 2023. "Rotation to sparse loadings using Lp losses and related inference problems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118349, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Thomas Despois & Catherine Doz, 2021. "Identifying and interpreting the factors in factor models via sparsity: Different approaches," Working Papers halshs-02235543, HAL.
    7. Giovanni Franco, 2014. "Toward a simple structure: a comparison of different rotation techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1785-1797, May.
    8. Vervloet, Marlies & Kiers, Henk A. L. & Van den Noortgate, Wim & Ceulemans, Eva, 2015. "PCovR: An R Package for Principal Covariates Regression," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 65(i08).
    9. Urbano Lorenzo-Seva, 2003. "A factor simplicity index," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 49-60, March.
    10. Thomas Despois & Catherine Doz, 2022. "Identifying and interpreting the factors in factor models via sparsity : Different approaches," PSE Working Papers halshs-03626503, HAL.
    11. Lorenzo-Seva, U. & van de Velden, M. & Kiers, H.A.L., 2007. "Oblique rotation in correspondence analysis: a step forward in the simplest interpretation," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-25, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    12. Xinyi Liu & Gabriel Wallin & Yunxiao Chen & Irini Moustaki, 2023. "Rotation to Sparse Loadings Using $$L^p$$ L p Losses and Related Inference Problems," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 527-553, June.
    13. Robert Jennrich, 2002. "A simple general method for oblique rotation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 7-19, March.
    14. Emilio Crisol Moya & Vanesa Gámiz Sánchez & María Asunción Romero López, 2021. "University Students’ Emotions When Using E-Portfolios in Virtual Education Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Dawn Iacobucci & Doug Grisaffe, 2018. "Perceptual maps via enhanced correspondence analysis: representing confidence regions to clarify brand positions," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(3), pages 72-83, September.
    16. Peter Filzmoser, 2000. "Orthogonal principal planes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 363-376, September.
    17. Urbano Lorenzo-Seva, 2000. "The weighted oblimin rotation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 301-318, September.
    18. Jin, Shaobo & Moustaki, Irini & Yang-Wallentin, Fan, 2018. "Approximated penalized maximum likelihood for exploratory factor analysis: an orthogonal case," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88118, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Brett Williams & Lisa McKenna & Jill French & Simon Dousek, 2013. "Measurement properties of a peer‐teaching scale for nursing education," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 368-373, September.
    20. Higham, Kyle & de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Jaffe, Adam B., 2021. "Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:87:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-021-09833-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.