IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comgts/v18y2021i3d10.1007_s10287-020-00386-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic single machine scheduling problem as a multi-stage dynamic random decision process

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Roohnavazfar

    (Politecnico di Torino
    Kharazmi University)

  • Daniele Manerba

    (University of Brescia)

  • Lohic Fotio Tiotsop

    (Politecnico di Torino)

  • Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh

    (Kharazmi University)

  • Roberto Tadei

    (Politecnico di Torino)

Abstract

In this work, we study a stochastic single machine scheduling problem in which the features of learning effect on processing times, sequence-dependent setup times, and machine configuration selection are considered simultaneously. More precisely, the machine works under a set of configurations and requires stochastic sequence-dependent setup times to switch from one configuration to another. Also, the stochastic processing time of a job is a function of its position and the machine configuration. The objective is to find the sequence of jobs and choose a configuration to process each job to minimize the makespan. We first show that the proposed problem can be formulated through two-stage and multi-stage Stochastic Programming models, which are challenging from the computational point of view. Then, by looking at the problem as a multi-stage dynamic random decision process, a new deterministic approximation-based formulation is developed. The method first derives a mixed-integer non-linear model based on the concept of accessibility to all possible and available alternatives at each stage of the decision-making process. Then, to efficiently solve the problem, a new accessibility measure is defined to convert the model into the search of a shortest path throughout the stages. Extensive computational experiments are carried out on various sets of instances. We discuss and compare the results found by the resolution of plain stochastic models with those obtained by the deterministic approximation approach. Our approximation shows excellent performances both in terms of solution accuracy and computational time.

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Roohnavazfar & Daniele Manerba & Lohic Fotio Tiotsop & Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh & Roberto Tadei, 2021. "Stochastic single machine scheduling problem as a multi-stage dynamic random decision process," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 267-297, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:18:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10287-020-00386-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10287-020-00386-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10287-020-00386-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10287-020-00386-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allahverdi, Ali, 2015. "The third comprehensive survey on scheduling problems with setup times/costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 345-378.
    2. Perboli, Guido & Tadei, Roberto & Gobbato, Luca, 2014. "The Multi-Handler Knapsack Problem under Uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(3), pages 1000-1007.
    3. Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata & Perboli, Guido, 2018. "The Capacitated Supplier Selection problem with Total Quantity Discount policy and Activation Costs under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 119-132.
    4. Jian Yang & Gang Yu, 2002. "On the Robust Single Machine Scheduling Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 17-33, March.
    5. Roberto Tadei & Guido Perboli & Francesca Perfetti, 2017. "The multi-path Traveling Salesman Problem with stochastic travel costs," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 3-23, March.
    6. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    7. Biskup, Dirk, 1999. "Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 173-178, May.
    8. Laureano Escudero & Araceli Garín & María Merino & Gloria Pérez, 2007. "The value of the stochastic solution in multistage problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(1), pages 48-64, July.
    9. Mosheiov, Gur, 2001. "Scheduling problems with a learning effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 687-693, August.
    10. Jia-zhen Huo & Lei Ning & Li Sun, 2018. "Group Scheduling with General Autonomous and Induced Learning Effect," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-5, August.
    11. Komgrit Leksakul & Anulark Techanitisawad, 2005. "An application of the neural network energy function to machine sequencing," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 309-338, November.
    12. Soroush, H.M., 2007. "Minimizing the weighted number of early and tardy jobs in a stochastic single machine scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 266-287, August.
    13. Ameni Azzouz & Meriem Ennigrou & Lamjed Ben Said, 2018. "Scheduling problems under learning effects: classification and cartography," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 1642-1661, February.
    14. H.M. Soroush, 2014. "Stochastic bicriteria single machine scheduling with sequence-dependent job attributes and job-dependent learning effects," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 421-456.
    15. Dudek, RA & Smith, ML & Panwalkar, SS, 1974. "Use of a case study in sequencing/scheduling research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 253-261, April.
    16. Roohnavazfar, Mina & Manerba, Daniele & De Martin, Juan Carlos & Tadei, Roberto, 2019. "Optimal paths in multi-stage stochastic decision networks," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    17. Francesca Maggioni & Florian A. Potra & Marida Bertocchi, 2017. "A scenario-based framework for supply planning under uncertainty: stochastic programming versus robust optimization approaches," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 5-44, January.
    18. Richard L. Daniels & Panagiotis Kouvelis, 1995. "Robust Scheduling to Hedge Against Processing Time Uncertainty in Single-Stage Production," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 363-376, February.
    19. Baldi, Mauro Maria & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Tadei, Roberto, 2012. "The generalized bin packing problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1205-1220.
    20. Mehmet Ertem & Feristah Ozcelik & Tugba Saraç, 2019. "Single machine scheduling problem with stochastic sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 3273-3289, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zong-Jun Wei & Li-Yan Wang & Lei Zhang & Ji-Bo Wang & Ershen Wang, 2023. "Single-Machine Maintenance Activity Scheduling with Convex Resource Constraints and Learning Effects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Pei, Zhi & Lu, Haimin & Jin, Qingwei & Zhang, Lianmin, 2022. "Target-based distributionally robust optimization for single machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 420-431.
    3. Yang, Wen-Hua & Chand, Suresh, 2008. "Learning and forgetting effects on a group scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1033-1044, June.
    4. Zhang, Zhe & Song, Xiaoling & Huang, Huijung & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Yin, Yong, 2022. "Logic-based Benders decomposition method for the seru scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup time and DeJong’s learning effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 866-877.
    5. Perboli, Guido & Brotcorne, Luce & Bruni, Maria Elena & Rosano, Mariangela, 2021. "A new model for Last-Mile Delivery and Satellite Depots management: The impact of the on-demand economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Lung-Yu Li & Jian-You Xu & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & Xingong Zhang & Win-Chin Lin & Jia-Cheng Lin & Zong-Lin Wu & Chin-Chia Wu, 2022. "A Genetic Hyper-Heuristic for an Order Scheduling Problem with Two Scenario-Dependent Parameters in a Parallel-Machine Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Chang, Zhiqi & Song, Shiji & Zhang, Yuli & Ding, Jian-Ya & Zhang, Rui & Chiong, Raymond, 2017. "Distributionally robust single machine scheduling with risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 261-274.
    8. Baruch Mor & Gur Mosheiov & Dana Shapira, 2020. "Flowshop scheduling with learning effect and job rejection," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 631-641, December.
    9. Lu, Haimin & Pei, Zhi, 2023. "Single machine scheduling with release dates: A distributionally robust approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 19-37.
    10. Allahverdi, Ali, 2016. "A survey of scheduling problems with no-wait in process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 665-686.
    11. Zhang Xingong & Wang Yong & Bai Shikun, 2016. "Single-machine group scheduling problems with deteriorating and learning effect," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(10), pages 2402-2410, July.
    12. Roohnavazfar, Mina & Manerba, Daniele & De Martin, Juan Carlos & Tadei, Roberto, 2019. "Optimal paths in multi-stage stochastic decision networks," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    13. Xingong Zhang & Guangle Yan & Wanzhen Huang & Guochun Tang, 2011. "Single-machine scheduling problems with time and position dependent processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 345-356, June.
    14. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    15. Biskup, Dirk, 2008. "A state-of-the-art review on scheduling with learning effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 315-329, July.
    16. Hinder, Oliver & Mason, Andrew J., 2017. "A novel integer programing formulation for scheduling with family setup times on a single machine to minimize maximum lateness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 411-423.
    17. Ravindran Vijayalakshmi, Vipin & Schröder, Marc & Tamir, Tami, 2024. "Minimizing total completion time with machine-dependent priority lists," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 844-854.
    18. Finke, Gerd & Gara-Ali, Ahmed & Espinouse, Marie-Laure & Jost, Vincent & Moncel, Julien, 2017. "Unified matrix approach to solve production-maintenance problems on a single machine," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 140-146.
    19. Kai-biao Sun & Hong-xing Li, 2009. "Some single-machine scheduling problems with actual time and position dependent learning effects," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 161-177, June.
    20. Hamta, Nima & Fatemi Ghomi, S.M.T. & Jolai, F. & Akbarpour Shirazi, M., 2013. "A hybrid PSO algorithm for a multi-objective assembly line balancing problem with flexible operation times, sequence-dependent setup times and learning effect," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 99-111.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comgts:v:18:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10287-020-00386-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.