IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indpol/v7y2019i1p70-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Reserved Constituencies Dalit Centric? Experience from Uttar Pradesh

Author

Listed:
  • Shilp Shikha Singh
  • Manjur Ali

Abstract

In the state of Uttar Pradesh, Dalits have largely been elected only from the reserved seats, and their representation from non-reserved seats has remained negligible. Apart from ensuring political presence, how do reserved seats impinge on the Dalit politics within the constituency? Who determines the election outcome in the reserved seats? The article argues that in the reserved seats of the State of Uttar Pradesh, Dalit votes remain at best adjunct votes, to the core support base of the respective parties. There is evidence of systemic political backlash from non-Dalit voters against Dalit voters in reserved constituencies. Various parties play a significant role in orchestrating this backlash to help their candidates win. The weak position of the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), the party of Dalits in the reserved seats, is an indication of such a backlash. This backlash is largely aimed at the dominant Dalit group, the Chamars, who are treated as political untouchables by one and all, across caste and class.

Suggested Citation

  • Shilp Shikha Singh & Manjur Ali, 2019. "Are Reserved Constituencies Dalit Centric? Experience from Uttar Pradesh," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 7(1), pages 70-82, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:70-82
    DOI: 10.1177/2321023019838652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2321023019838652
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2321023019838652?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indpol:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:70-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.