IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v15y2023i4p155-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management of Gamified Lesson: Understanding Aesthetics and Acceptance among Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Nor Azairiah Fatimah Othman
  • Amir Imran Zainoddin
  • Azila Jaini
  • Mazida Ismail
  • Siti Fatimah Mohamad Radzi
  • dan Norashikin Hussein

Abstract

Joyful learning evokes happy feelings and subsequently induces positive academic achievement. With the rise of mental health issues due to intense study among students, gamification has recently grown in popularity among academic institutions to make learners happier, more engaged and ultimately improve learning outcomes. However, the management of gamified lessons has been a problem for years for all education levels on a varying basis. Nowadays, it is increasingly recognized that not all learners are acceptive of gamified lessons for learning. Drawing on a survey of 283 students of higher learning institutions, this study found that aesthetics, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment have a favorable impact on the intention to accept gamification in learning among learners. This study contributes to under-investigated scholarly works of suitable conditions under which gamified lesson best takes place with regard to aesthetics and learners’ acceptance that would be beneficial for the effective management of gamification.

Suggested Citation

  • Nor Azairiah Fatimah Othman & Amir Imran Zainoddin & Azila Jaini & Mazida Ismail & Siti Fatimah Mohamad Radzi & dan Norashikin Hussein, 2023. "Management of Gamified Lesson: Understanding Aesthetics and Acceptance among Learners," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(4), pages 155-162.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:155-162
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v15i4(SI)I.3588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/3588/2315
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/3588
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v15i4(SI)I.3588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:155-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.