IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v52y2000i3p595-605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Many-Person Corlett-Hague Tax Rule with Externalities

Author

Listed:
  • Pirttila, Jukka

Abstract

This study addresses environmental tax reforms in a many-person economy. Starting from a situation of uniform commodity taxation, a tax reform raising the tax on a good complementary to leisure or on a good that is environmentally harmful may be seen as welfare-improving as long as environmental externalities do not affect commodity demand. When environmental quality reduces commodity demand, a trade-off arises between the direct beneficial impact of the higher environmental tax and its indirect, harmful impact caused by reduced tax revenues. A second trade-off may also arise from a conflict between efficiency and distributional equity. Copyright 2000 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Pirttila, Jukka, 2000. "A Many-Person Corlett-Hague Tax Rule with Externalities," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 595-605, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:52:y:2000:i:3:p:595-605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacobs, Bas & de Mooij, Ruud A., 2015. "Pigou meets Mirrlees: On the irrelevance of tax distortions for the second-best Pigouvian tax," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 90-108.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:52:y:2000:i:3:p:595-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.