IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natene/v3y2018i8d10.1038_s41560-018-0142-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for evaluating geographic disparities in energy transition vulnerability

Author

Listed:
  • Sanya Carley

    (Indiana University)

  • Tom P. Evans

    (Indiana University)

  • Michelle Graff

    (Indiana University)

  • David M. Konisky

    (Indiana University)

Abstract

The path towards decarbonization promises many societal benefits such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and new technological innovation. The adverse effects of policies that are helping to facilitate the energy transition, such as price spikes or job displacement, however, are not evenly spread across the population, and some individuals and communities are more vulnerable to possible adverse impacts than others. Here, we adapt a framework for conceptualizing vulnerability from the climate change adaptation literature to the energy context. We construct the dimensions of the framework, provide an illustration using the case of the renewable portfolio standard, generate a vulnerability score measure and map vulnerability across US counties. Our analysis shows that this framework can be used to identify geographical disparities, and should be further developed in future research to provide deeper insights about a just transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanya Carley & Tom P. Evans & Michelle Graff & David M. Konisky, 2018. "A framework for evaluating geographic disparities in energy transition vulnerability," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 621-627, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:3:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1038_s41560-018-0142-z
    DOI: 10.1038/s41560-018-0142-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-018-0142-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41560-018-0142-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natene:v:3:y:2018:i:8:d:10.1038_s41560-018-0142-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.