IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2818-d1057304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the Factors Influencing Polish Consumers’ Approach towards New Food Products on the Market

Author

Listed:
  • Arkadiusz Piwowar

    (Department of Economics and Organization of Food Economy, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Wioletta Wolańska

    (Department of Forecasts and Economic Analysis, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Orkusz

    (Department of Biotechnology and Food Analysis, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Magdalena Kapelko

    (Department of Logistics, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Joanna Harasym

    (Department of Biotechnology and Food Analysis, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

The sustainability of food systems and circular economy aspects are ending the traditional food approaches and are demanding changes in raw materials and products supplied by agriculture and the food industry. However, the “supply” of new products is the easiest to achieve, while gaining the acceptance of consumers for a new product will always be the toughest. For the consumer the new product is an item which until recently was not known or used. However, considering the newness of products concept on a scientific basis, it is obvious that the concept covers new, novel, and innovative food products. The study applies an advanced analysis of the factors that drive the consumers’ acceptance of new products (perceived as new, novel, and innovative) on the food market in Poland. Specifically, seaweeds (as new), edible insects (as novel), and 3D-printed personalized food products (as innovative) were chosen. The selected factors influencing the Polish consumers’ approach towards the newness of food products, including the different tendencies to accept innovations in this area, were analyzed by using factor and reliability analysis. The assessment of the differences towards an acceptance of new products based on the socio-demographic characteristics of the consumer was completed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Furthermore, to analyze the features favoring the acceptance of new products, the logistic regression was estimated. The article presents the results of a survey of 500 Polish respondents in the 20–44 age group. The profound statistical analysis showed that the destiny of foreign travel turned out to be an important variable in the logistic regression model.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkadiusz Piwowar & Wioletta Wolańska & Agnieszka Orkusz & Magdalena Kapelko & Joanna Harasym, 2023. "Modelling the Factors Influencing Polish Consumers’ Approach towards New Food Products on the Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2818-:d:1057304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2818/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2818/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Orkusz & Wioletta Wolańska & Joanna Harasym & Arkadiusz Piwowar & Magdalena Kapelko, 2020. "Consumers’ Attitudes Facing Entomophagy: Polish Case Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Ricci, Elena Claire & Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2018. "Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 54-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danilo Bertoni & Daniele Cavicchioli & Franco Donzelli & Giovanni Ferrazzi & Dario G. Frisio & Roberto Pretolani & Elena Claire Ricci & Vera Ventura, 2018. "Recent Contributions of Agricultural Economics Research in the Field of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Janvier Kini & Nicky Pouw & Joyeeta Gupta, 2020. "Organic vegetables demand in urban area using a count outcome model: case study of Burkina Faso," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Chiara Mazzocchi & Guido Sali, 2022. "Supporting mountain agriculture through “mountain product” label: a choice experiment approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 701-723, January.
    4. Rusitha Wijekoon & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2021. "Determinants That Influence Green Product Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-40, May.
    5. Russell Tatenda Munodawafa & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Catherine Macombe, 2021. "Is an alternative to private property durable in agriculture?," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(1), pages 1-11.
    7. Yuriy Danko & Olena Nifatova, 2022. "Agro-sphere determinants of green branding: eco-consumption, loyalty, and price premium," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Taneja, Shilpa & Ali, Liaqat, 2021. "Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Harry Jeong & Kwangsoo Shin, 2022. "How Does Adolescents’ Usage of Social Media Affect Their Dietary Satisfaction?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Lindokule Mbokane & Lee-Ann Modley, 2024. "Green Consumerism in Young Adults: Attitudes and Awareness in University Students in Johannesburg, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Ajay Philip & Rahul R. Marathe, 2022. "A New Green Labeling Scheme for Agri-Food Supply Chains: Equilibrium and Information Sharing under Uncertainties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-34, November.
    12. Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Iris Vermeir & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Florin Laurentiu Crista & Ioan Banatean-Dunea, 2020. "Traditional Foods at the Click of a Button: The Preference for the Online Purchase of Romanian Traditional Foods during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Karolina Bielawska & Magdalena Grebosz-Krawczyk, 2021. "Consumers’ Choice Behaviour Toward Green Clothing," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 238-256.
    14. Kitchel, Hannah & Boehm, Rebecca L. & Cash, Sean B., 2018. "Does Consumer Climate Change Knowledge and Risk Perception Influence Willingness to Pay for Climate Mitigation in Beverage Crop Production?," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274067, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Ye Sang & Heeseung Yu & Eunkyoung Han, 2022. "Understanding the Barriers to Consumer Purchasing of Zero-Waste Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Chung-Ling Chen & Xiang-Nong Jian & Wen-Hao Jiang, 2024. "The Last but Not the Least Piece of Marine Debris Management: Decoding Factors in Consumers’ Intentions to Purchase Recycled Marine Debris Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Elena Claire Ricci & Alessandro Banterle, 2018. "The effects of expo Milano 2015 on consumer food choices," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(2), pages 233-244.
    18. Min-Yen Chang & Lin-Jyun Huang & Han-Shen Chen, 2021. "Towards More Sustainable Diets: Investigating Consumer Motivations towards the Purchase of Green Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Raquel P. F. Guiné & Sofia G. Florença & Cristina A. Costa & Paula M. R. Correia & Manuela Ferreira & Ana P. Cardoso & Sofia Campos & Ofélia Anjos & Cristina Chuck-Hernández & Marijana Matek Sarić & I, 2022. "Investigation of the Level of Knowledge in Different Countries about Edible Insects: Cluster Segmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Teerapong Pienwisetkaew & Peerapong Wongthahan & Phaninee Naruetharadhol & Sasichakorn Wongsaichia & Chonnipa Vonganunsuntree & Siraphat Padthar & Santi Nee & Ping He & Chavis Ketkaew, 2022. "Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Functional Non-Dairy Milk and Gender-Based Market Segmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2818-:d:1057304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.