IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v47y2023i10s030859612300174x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of internet use on the perceptions of class boundaries and life trajectories: A report from a representative survey in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Chun
  • Liu, Hao
  • Zhang, Huiping
  • Yuan, Qin

Abstract

In recent years, the rigidification of the social structure in Chinese society has attracted public attention. Conventional wisdom holds that internet use could potentially improve upward class mobility. However, little empirical research has been conducted in the Chinese context. The current study aims to investigate the effects of different types of internet use on perceived future mobility. This study demonstrates that perceived upward future mobility is generally maintained in China. Internet experience leads to a negative impact of the internet on perceived future mobility. Furthermore, entertainment use positively affects perceived future mobility, while information-seeking use negatively affects perceived future mobility. This study shows that the effects of different types of internet use on perceived future mobility are heterogeneous across age groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Chun & Liu, Hao & Zhang, Huiping & Yuan, Qin, 2023. "The impact of internet use on the perceptions of class boundaries and life trajectories: A report from a representative survey in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:47:y:2023:i:10:s030859612300174x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030859612300174X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul DiMaggio & Eszter Hargittai & W. Russell Neuman & John P. Robinson, 2001. "Social Implications of the Internet," Working Papers 159, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    2. Weiyong Zou & Yunjun Xiong, 2023. "Does artificial intelligence promote industrial upgrading? Evidence from China," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 1666-1687, March.
    3. Bjørnskov, Christian & Dreher, Axel & Fischer, Justina A.V. & Schnellenbach, Jan & Gehring, Kai, 2013. "Inequality and happiness: When perceived social mobility and economic reality do not match," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 75-92.
    4. Alberto Alesina & Stefanie Stantcheva & Edoardo Teso, 2018. "Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(2), pages 521-554, February.
    5. Mu, Ren, 2022. "Perceived relative income, fairness, and the role of government: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Wang, Xue & Chen, Wei-Fen & Hong, Ying-Yi & Chen, Zhansheng, 2022. "Perceiving high social mobility breeds materialism: The mediating role of socioeconomic status uncertainty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 629-638.
    7. Siwei Cheng & Fangqi Wen, 2019. "Americans overestimate the intergenerational persistence in income ranks," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116(28), pages 13909-13914, July.
    8. Anrijs, Sarah & Mariën, Ilse & De Marez, Lieven & Ponnet, Koen, 2023. "Excluded from essential internet services: Examining associations between digital exclusion, socio-economic resources and internet resources," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    9. Xian Huang, 2020. "The Chinese Dream: Hukou, Social Mobility, and Trust in Government," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(5), pages 2052-2070, September.
    10. Kwok-Kee Wei & Hock-Hai Teo & Hock Chuan Chan & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2011. "Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 170-187, March.
    11. Paul DiMaggio & Eszter Hargittai & W. Russell Neuman & John P. Robinson, 2001. "Social Implications of the Internet," Working Papers 159, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    12. Campos-Matos, Inês & Kawachi, Ichiro, 2015. "Social mobility and health in European countries: Does welfare regime type matter?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 241-248.
    13. Zhu, Zhongkun & Ma, Wanglin & Sousa-Poza, Alfonso & Leng, Chenxin, 2020. "The effect of internet usage on perceptions of social fairness: Evidence from rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Peggy Froerer, 2011. "Education, Inequality and Social Mobility in Central India," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 23(5), pages 695-711, December.
    15. Yu Xie & Hao Dong & Xiang Zhou & Xi Song, 2022. "Trends in social mobility in postrevolution China," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(7), pages 2117471119-, February.
    16. Marginson, Simon, 2018. "Higher education, economic inequality and social mobility: Implications for emerging East Asia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 4-11.
    17. Jose, Victor Richmond R. & Winkler, Robert L., 2008. "Simple robust averages of forecasts: Some empirical results," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 163-169.
    18. Nicole Zillien & Eszter Hargittai, 2009. "Digital Distinction: Status‐Specific Types of Internet Usage," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(2), pages 274-291, June.
    19. Liu, Chun & Wang, Lian, 2021. "Who is left behind? Exploring the characteristics of China's broadband non-adopting families," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Myovella, Godwin & Karacuka, Mehmet & Haucap, Justus, 2021. "Determinants of digitalization and digital divide in Sub-Saharan African economies: A spatial Durbin analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10).
    2. Ren, Wei & Zhu, Xiaowen, 2024. "The age-based digital divides in China: Trends and socioeconomic differentials (2010–2020)," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).
    3. Volker Lang & Steffen Hillmert, 2016. "Differential trends in households’ connection to the Internet: An actor-centered explanation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 28(2), pages 141-171, May.
    4. Silva, Diego S. & Yamashita, Gabrielli Harumi & Cortimiglia, Marcelo Nogueira & Brust-Renck, Priscila G. & ten Caten, Carla Schwengber, 2022. "Are we ready to assess digital readiness? Exploring digital implications for social progress from the Network Readiness Index," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Yanina Welp & Ferran Urgell & Eduard Aibar, 2007. "From Bureaucratic Administration to Network Administration? An Empirical Study on E-Government Focus on Catalonia," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 299-316, December.
    6. Stan Geertman & John Stillwell, 2020. "Planning support science: Developments and challenges," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1326-1342, October.
    7. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Davidson Okai & Alberto Posso, 2016. "Internet Use and Ethnic Heterogeneity in a Cross-Section of Countries," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(1), pages 59-72, March.
    8. Angelo Antoci & Alexia Delfino & Fabio Paglieri & Fabrizio Panebianco & Fabio Sabatini, 2016. "Civility vs. Incivility in Online Social Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Andrea Fazio & Tommaso Reggiani, 2022. "Minimum wage and tolerance for inequality," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2022-07, Masaryk University, revised Feb 2023.
    10. Carlota Batres & David I Perrett, 2014. "The Influence of the Digital Divide on Face Preferences in El Salvador: People without Internet Access Prefer More Feminine Men, More Masculine Women, and Women with Higher Adiposity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-6, July.
    11. Barton, Jared & Pan, Xiaofei, 2022. "Movin’ on up? A survey experiment on mobility enhancing policies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Özbay, Özden, 2008. "Does social capital deter youth from cheating, alcohol use, and violence in Turkey?: Bringing torpil in," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 403-415, September.
    13. Dohse, Dirk & Lim, Cheng Yee, 2016. "Macro-geographic location and internet adoption in poor countries: What is behind the persistent digital gap?," Kiel Working Papers 2067, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Judit Bar-Ilan, 2018. "Eugene Garfield on the Web in 2001," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 389-399, February.
    15. Belguise, Margot & Huang, Yuchen & Mo, Zhexun, 2023. "Non-Meritocrats or Conformist Meritocrats? A Redistribution Experiment in China and France," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2308, CEPREMAP.
    16. Dejean, Sylvain & Jullien, Nicolas, 2015. "Big from the beginning: Assessing online contributors’ behavior by their first contribution," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6), pages 1226-1239.
    17. Judy Wajcman & Emily Rose & Judith E. Brown & Michael Bittman, 2010. "Enacting virtual connections between work and home," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29439, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Uwe Matzat, 2004. "The Social Embeddedness of Academic Online Groups in Offline Networks as a Norm Generating Structure: An Empirical Test of the Coleman Model on Norm Emergence," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 205-226, November.
    19. Nevado-Peña, Domingo & López-Ruiz, Víctor-Raúl & Alfaro-Navarro, José-Luis, 2019. "Improving quality of life perception with ICT use and technological capacity in Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Ali, Maged & Gomes, Lucas Moreira & Azab, Nahed & de Moraes Souza, João Gabriel & Sorour, M. Karim & Kimura, Herbert, 2023. "Panic buying and fake news in urban vs. rural England: A case study of twitter during COVID-19," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:47:y:2023:i:10:s030859612300174x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.