IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/oprepe/v7y2020ics2214716020300476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A pricing scheme for a human embryo storage service as a source for a secondary market

Author

Listed:
  • Herbon, Avi
  • Lahav, Yael
  • Spiegel, Uriel

Abstract

A large reservoir of frozen human embryos is a negative outcome of their cryostorage for in vitro fertilization treatments. The existence of unused stored embryos, referred to herein as “remaining embryos”, places the service provider (usually a hospital) in a fragile situation. This is especially the case when the issue of discarding unused embryos arises or when unexpected failures associated with preserving the inventory occur. Moreover, the absence of intrinsic incentives for couples to donate embryos to the secondary market, as well as the increased operational costs for maintaining a viable storage service over time, further challenge this unique service. The present paper develops an optimization model that determines a charging scheme for the couples using the storage service and a payment scheme for couples who agree to provide their remaining embryos as a source for the secondary market. Couples who do not agree to receive payment for their remaining embryos are charged for discarding them (referred to herein as the “discarding payment”). While this model includes rewards and motivates couples to provide embryos for the secondary market, it also reduces the remaining inventory, thereby responding to the two key problems of embryo storage. The analytically developed model is used to derive optimal solution algorithms. A numerical example and a sensitivity analysis of the key parameters are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Herbon, Avi & Lahav, Yael & Spiegel, Uriel, 2020. "A pricing scheme for a human embryo storage service as a source for a secondary market," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:7:y:2020:i:c:s2214716020300476
    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2020.100157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716020300476
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.orp.2020.100157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P-S You, 2005. "Inventory policy for products with price and time-dependent demands," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(7), pages 870-873, July.
    2. Gan, Shu San & Pujawan, I. Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2015. "Pricing decision model for new and remanufactured short-life cycle products with time-dependent demand," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Shmuel S. Oren & Stephen A. Smith, 1981. "Critical Mass and Tariff Structure in Electronic Communications Markets," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(2), pages 467-487, Autumn.
    4. Teodorovic, Dusan & Lucic, Panta, 2006. "Intelligent parking systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1666-1681, December.
    5. Gabriel Bitran & René Caldentey, 2003. "An Overview of Pricing Models for Revenue Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 203-229, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lahav, Yael & Herbon, Avi & Spiegel, Uriel, 2023. "The cost-benefit approach to an optimal charging scheme for an embryo storage service," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 10(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herbon, Avi, 2017. "Should retailers hold a perishable product having different ages? The case of a homogeneous market and multiplicative demand model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 479-490.
    2. Fleischmann, M. & Hall, J.M. & Pyke, D.F., 2005. "A Dynamic Pricing Model for Coordinated Sales and Operations," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-074-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Onur Kaya & Aylin Lelizar Polat, 2017. "Coordinated pricing and inventory decisions for perishable products," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 589-606, March.
    4. Onur Kaya & Sajjad Rahimi Ghahroodi, 2018. "Inventory control and pricing for perishable products under age and price dependent stochastic demand," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 88(1), pages 1-35, August.
    5. Vincent Mak & Amnon Rapoport & Eyran J. Gisches & Jiaojie Han, 2014. "Purchasing Scarce Products Under Dynamic Pricing: An Experimental Investigation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 425-438, July.
    6. Schulte, Benedikt & Sachs, Anna-Lena, 2020. "The price-setting newsvendor with Poisson demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 125-137.
    7. Mitomo, Hitoshi, 2017. "Data Network Effects: Implications for Data Business," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169484, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Dasci, A. & Karakul, M., 2009. "Two-period dynamic versus fixed-ratio pricing in a capacity constrained duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 945-968, September.
    9. Alessandro Avenali & Yuri Maria Chianese & Graziano Ciucciarelli & Giorgio Grani & Laura Palagi, 2019. "Profit optimization in one-way free float car sharing services: a user based relocation strategy relying on price differentiation and Urban Area Values," DIAG Technical Reports 2019-04, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    10. František Milichovský, 2017. "An Impact of Reverse Logistics Activities on Marketing Communication," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 669-678.
    11. Yiwei Chen & Vivek F. Farias, 2013. "Simple Policies for Dynamic Pricing with Imperfect Forecasts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 612-624, June.
    12. Vincent Mak & Amnon Rapoport & Eyran J. Gisches, 2018. "Dynamic Pricing Decisions and Seller-Buyer Interactions under Capacity Constraints," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Yuri Levin & Jeff McGill & Mikhail Nediak, 2008. "Risk in Revenue Management and Dynamic Pricing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 326-343, April.
    14. Adam J. Mersereau & Dan Zhang, 2012. "Markdown Pricing with Unknown Fraction of Strategic Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 355-370, July.
    15. Talebian, Masoud & Boland, Natashia & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2014. "Pricing to accelerate demand learning in dynamic assortment planning for perishable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 555-565.
    16. Sabri Çelik & Alp Muharremoglu & Sergei Savin, 2009. "Revenue Management with Costly Price Adjustments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1206-1219, October.
    17. Hahn, Jong-Hee, 2003. "Nonlinear pricing of telecommunications with call and network externalities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 21(7), pages 949-967, September.
    18. René Caldentey & Gustavo Vulcano, 2007. "Online Auction and List Price Revenue Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 795-813, May.
    19. Qi (George) Chen & Stefanus Jasin & Izak Duenyas, 2016. "Real-Time Dynamic Pricing with Minimal and Flexible Price Adjustment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2437-2455, August.
    20. Chen, Bo & Zhang, Xiandong, 2019. "Scheduling with time-of-use costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 900-908.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:7:y:2020:i:c:s2214716020300476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.