IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v285y2023ics0360544223026841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China's carbon emissions and energy demand under different methods of global mitigation cooperation: Application of an extended RICE model with energy details

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Kun
  • Yang, Zili
  • Liang, Qiao-Mei
  • Liao, Hua
  • Yu, Bi-Ying
  • Wei, Yi-Ming

Abstract

This study extends the classic RICE model by introducing energy factors into the economic module and comprehensively describes different types of energy demands. Taking China as an example, we constructed the RICE-China model and further explored the impact of different cooperation methods on China's carbon emissions and energy demand. The main results are as follows. First, there are significant differences in China's emission reduction under different cooperation scenarios. In the Lindahl cooperation scenario, China's carbon emissions in 2100 have reduced by 90.5 % to achieve the two-degree goal, which is lower than the utilitarian cooperation scenario. Second, the decline in China's fossil energy under the utilitarian scenario is higher than that under the Lindal scenario. Specifically, China's fossil energy demand decreased by 91.4 % in 2100 under the Lindal scenario, with non-fossil energy accounting for 94.7 % of total energy consumption. Third, China's emission reduction in the later period under the RICE-China model is lower than that of the RICE model, and the corresponding GDP loss has also decreased. Specifically, China's GDP losses under the RICE-China model are approximately 1.5–2.8% points lower than those under the RICE model. This study provides new insights for China to participate in international climate cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Kun & Yang, Zili & Liang, Qiao-Mei & Liao, Hua & Yu, Bi-Ying & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2023. "China's carbon emissions and energy demand under different methods of global mitigation cooperation: Application of an extended RICE model with energy details," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:285:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223026841
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223026841
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorvaldur Gylfason & Gylfi Zoega, 2006. "Natural Resources and Economic Growth: The Role of Investment," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 1091-1115, August.
    2. Zili Yang, 2008. "Strategic Bargaining and Cooperation in Greenhouse Gas Mitigations: An Integrated Assessment Modeling Approach," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262240548, December.
    3. Leonidas Paroussos & Antoine Mandel & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Panagiotis Fragkos & Jochen Hinkel & Zoi Vrontisi, 2019. "Climate clubs and the macro-economic benefits of international cooperation on climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 542-546, July.
    4. Popp, David, 2004. "ENTICE: endogenous technological change in the DICE model of global warming," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 742-768, July.
    5. Yang, Zili & Nordhaus, William D., 2006. "Magnitude and direction of technological transfers for mitigating GHG emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(5-6), pages 730-741, November.
    6. Wang, En-Ze & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2022. "The impact of clean energy consumption on economic growth in China: Is environmental regulation a curse or a blessing?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-58.
    7. William Nordhaus, 2018. "Projections and Uncertainties about Climate Change in an Era of Minimal Climate Policies," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 333-360, August.
    8. Shu Zhang & Wenying Chen, 2022. "Assessing the energy transition in China towards carbon neutrality with a probabilistic framework," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Lint Barrage & William D. Nordhaus, 2023. "Policies, Projections, and the Social Cost of Carbon: Results from the DICE-2023 Model," NBER Working Papers 31112, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Keen, Steve & Ayres, Robert U. & Standish, Russell, 2019. "A Note on the Role of Energy in Production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 40-46.
    11. Popp, David, 2006. "ENTICE-BR: The effects of backstop technology R&D on climate policy models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 188-222, March.
    12. Yi-Ming Wei & Rong Han & Qiao-Mei Liang & Bi-Ying Yu & Yun-Fei Yao & Mei-Mei Xue & Kun Zhang & Li-Jing Liu & Juan Peng & Pu Yang & Zhi-Fu Mi & Yun-Fei Du & Ce Wang & Jun-Jie Chang & Qian-Ru Yang & Zil, 2018. "An integrated assessment of INDCs under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: an implementation of C3IAM," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(2), pages 585-618, June.
    13. William D. Nordhaus, 2011. "Estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon: Background and Results from the RICE-2011 Model," NBER Working Papers 17540, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Jiang, Sijian & Deng, Xiangzheng & Liu, Gang & Zhang, Fan, 2021. "Climate change-induced economic impact assessment by parameterizing spatially heterogeneous CO2 distribution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Carrara, Samuel & Marangoni, Giacomo, 2017. "Including system integration of variable renewable energies in a constant elasticity of substitution framework: The case of the WITCH model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 612-626.
    16. Minho Baek & Qimin Chai & Suduk Kim, 2020. "How Carbon Market Cooperation Changes The Energy Systems In Northeast Asia," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(02), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Edelenbosch, O.Y. & van Vuuren, D.P. & Blok, K. & Calvin, K. & Fujimori, S., 2020. "Mitigating energy demand sector emissions: The integrated modelling perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    18. Diniz Oliveira, Thais & Costa Gurgel, Angelo & Tonry, Steve, 2019. "International market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement: A cooperation between Brazil and Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 397-409.
    19. Pan, Xunzhang & Chen, Wenying & Zhou, Sheng & Wang, Lining & Dai, Jiaquan & Zhang, Qi & Zheng, Xinzhu & Wang, Hailin, 2020. "Implications of near-term mitigation on China's long-term energy transitions for aligning with the Paris goals," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Tianpeng Wang & Fei Teng & Xiliang Zhang, 2020. "Assessing Global And National Economic Losses From Climate Change: A Study Based On Cgem-Iam In China," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(03), pages 1-23, August.
    21. Zhang, Hailing & Liu, Changxin & Wang, Can, 2021. "Extreme climate events and economic impacts in China: A CGE analysis with a new damage function in IAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    22. Thorvaldur Gylfason, 2006. "Natural Resources and Economic Growth: From Dependence to Diversification," Springer Books, in: Harry G. Broadman & Tiiu Paas & Paul J.J. Welfens (ed.), Economic Liberalization and Integration Policy, pages 201-231, Springer.
    23. Yang, Zili, 1999. "Should the north make unilateral technology transfers to the south?: North-South cooperation and conflicts in responses to global climate change," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 67-87, January.
    24. Messner, Sabine & Schrattenholzer, Leo, 2000. "MESSAGE–MACRO: linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 267-282.
    25. Qi, Tianyu & Weng, Yuyan, 2016. "Economic impacts of an international carbon market in achieving the INDC targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 886-893.
    26. Yang, Zili & Sirianni, Philip, 2010. "Balancing contemporary fairness and historical justice: A 'quasi-equitable' proposal for GHG mitigations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 1121-1130, September.
    27. John Weyant, 2017. "Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(1), pages 115-137.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gunter Stephan & Georg Müller-Fürstenberger, 2015. "Global Warming, Technological Change and Trade in Carbon Energy: Challenge or Threat?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(4), pages 791-809, December.
    2. Gunter Stephan & Georg Müller-Fürstenberger, 2014. "Global Warming, Technological Change and Trade in Carbon Energy: Challenge or Threat?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1397, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Kruse-Andersen, Peter Kjær, 2023. "Directed technical change, environmental sustainability, and population growth," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Maximiliano Marzetti & Rok Spruk, 2023. "Long-Term Economic Effects of Populist Legal Reforms: Evidence from Argentina," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 65(1), pages 60-95, March.
    5. Grimaud, André & Lafforgue, Gilles & Magné, Bertrand, 2011. "Climate change mitigation options and directed technical change: A decentralized equilibrium analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 938-962.
    6. Aguirre Unceta, Rafael, 2021. "The economic and social impact of mining-resources exploitation in Zambia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Muhamad, Goran M. & Heshmati, Almas & Khayyat, Nabaz T., 2021. "How to reduce the degree of dependency on natural resources?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Wang, Shuhong & Tian, Wenqian & Lu, Binbin, 2023. "Impact of capital investment and industrial structure optimization from the perspective of "resource curse": Evidence from developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Mort Webster & Karen Fisher-Vanden & David Popp & Nidhi Santen, 2017. "Should We Give Up after Solyndra? Optimal Technology R&D Portfolios under Uncertainty," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(S1), pages 123-151.
    10. Rogna, Marco & Vogt, Carla J., 2021. "Accounting for inequality aversion can justify the 2° C goal," Ruhr Economic Papers 925, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    11. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    12. Zhu, Junpeng & Lin, Boqiang, 2022. "Resource dependence, market-oriented reform, and industrial transformation: Empirical evidence from Chinese cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Grimaud, André & Lafforgue, Gilles & Magné, Bertrand, 2007. "Innovation Markets in the Policy Appraisal of Climate Change Mitigation," IDEI Working Papers 481, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    14. Nordhaus, William, 2013. "Integrated Economic and Climate Modeling," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1069-1131, Elsevier.
    15. Bakhsh, Satar & Zhang, Wei, 2023. "How does natural resource price volatility affect economic performance? A threshold effect of economic policy uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Zhang, Hong & Jin, Gui & Zhang, Zhengyu, 2021. "Coupling system of carbon emission and social economy: A review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Moritz A. Drupp & Martin C. Hänsel, 2021. "Relative Prices and Climate Policy: How the Scarcity of Nonmarket Goods Drives Policy Evaluation," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 168-201, February.
    18. Jing Ma & Young-Gyun Ahn & Min-Kyu Lee, 2022. "The Interactive Influence of Institutional Quality and Resource Dependence on Regional Economic Growth: Evidence from China’s Resource-Based Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Li, Chengyu & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Peng, 2023. "Does the “resource curse” have a spatial spillover effect? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Kpognon, Koffi D., 2022. "Fostering domestic resources mobilization in sub-Saharan Africa: Linking natural resources and ICT infrastructure to the size of informal economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:285:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223026841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.