IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v206y2020ics0360544220312810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Replacement of R134a with low-GWP fluids in a kW-size reciprocating piston expander: Performance prediction and design optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Bianchi, M.
  • Branchini, L.
  • De Pascale, A.
  • Melino, F.
  • Ottaviano, S.
  • Peretto, A.
  • Torricelli, N.

Abstract

In this study, low-GWP fluids (R1234yf and R1234ze(E)) have been compared with R134a when used in a kW-size reciprocating piston expander. Semi-empirical models of the pump and the expander are employed to analyze how the different fluids thermodynamic characteristics could influence machines behavior into real operation of a micro-ORC. Parameters related to thermo-fluid-dynamic properties are updated compared to the original values calibrated over R134a. Results show that the use of HFOs alternative fluids leads to a loss of electric power and expander efficiency, whose detriment depends on fluids properties and on operation strategy. At a given pressure ratio the decrease of power output is close to 21% and 42%, while the loss on expander efficiency is more limited, being around 6% and 11%, for R1234yf and for R1234ze(E), respectively. Main factors of influence such as saturation pressure, viscosity, heat transfer coefficients and vapour density are discussed. The expander model has also been used to perform the optimization of the built-in volume ratio for each fluid, revealing that a significant enhancement of the expander overall performance could be obtained modifying the intake valve timing, thus reducing under-expansion losses and improving its volumetric efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianchi, M. & Branchini, L. & De Pascale, A. & Melino, F. & Ottaviano, S. & Peretto, A. & Torricelli, N., 2020. "Replacement of R134a with low-GWP fluids in a kW-size reciprocating piston expander: Performance prediction and design optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312810
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220312810
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D'Amico, F. & Pallis, P. & Leontaritis, A.D. & Karellas, S. & Kakalis, N.M. & Rech, S. & Lazzaretto, A., 2018. "Semi-empirical model of a multi-diaphragm pump in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) experimental unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1056-1071.
    2. Dickes, Rémi & Dumont, Olivier & Daccord, Rémi & Quoilin, Sylvain & Lemort, Vincent, 2017. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle power systems in off-design conditions: An experimentally-validated comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 710-727.
    3. Lorenzo Tocci & Tamas Pal & Ioannis Pesmazoglou & Benjamin Franchetti, 2017. "Small Scale Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Techno-Economic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Pereira, João S. & Ribeiro, José B. & Mendes, Ricardo & Vaz, Gilberto C. & André, Jorge C., 2018. "ORC based micro-cogeneration systems for residential application – A state of the art review and current challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 728-743.
    5. Bianchi, M. & Branchini, L. & De Pascale, A. & Melino, F. & Ottaviano, S. & Peretto, A. & Torricelli, N., 2019. "Application and comparison of semi-empirical models for performance prediction of a kW-size reciprocating piston expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 143-156.
    6. Yulia Glavatskaya & Pierre Podevin & Vincent Lemort & Osoko Shonda & Georges Descombes, 2012. "Reciprocating Expander for an Exhaust Heat Recovery Rankine Cycle for a Passenger Car Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Wronski, Jorrit & Imran, Muhammad & Skovrup, Morten Juel & Haglind, Fredrik, 2019. "Experimental and numerical analysis of a reciprocating piston expander with variable valve timing for small-scale organic Rankine cycle power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 403-416.
    8. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    9. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Kaindl, Johannes & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd(Z) and R1233zd(E) as replacements for R245fa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 946-963.
    10. Yang, Jingye & Ye, Zhenhong & Yu, Binbin & Ouyang, Hongsheng & Chen, Jiangping, 2019. "Simultaneous experimental comparison of low-GWP refrigerants as drop-in replacements to R245fa for Organic Rankine cycle application: R1234ze(Z), R1233zd(E), and R1336mzz(E)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 721-731.
    11. Yamada, Noboru & Mohamad, Md Nor Anuar & Kien, Trinh Trung, 2012. "Study on thermal efficiency of low- to medium-temperature organic Rankine cycles using HFO−1234yf," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 368-375.
    12. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    13. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniarta, Sindu & Imre, Attila R. & Kolasiński, Piotr, 2022. "Thermodynamic efficiency of subcritical and transcritical power cycles utilizing selected ACZ working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    2. Ancona, Maria Alessandra & Bianchi, Michele & Branchini, Lisa & De Pascale, Andrea & Melino, Francesco & Peretto, Antonio & Poletto, Chiara & Torricelli, Noemi, 2022. "Solar driven micro-ORC system assessment for residential application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 167-181.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ancona, Maria Alessandra & Bianchi, Michele & Branchini, Lisa & De Pascale, Andrea & Melino, Francesco & Peretto, Antonio & Poletto, Chiara & Torricelli, Noemi, 2022. "Solar driven micro-ORC system assessment for residential application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 167-181.
    2. Bianchi, M. & Branchini, L. & De Pascale, A. & Melino, F. & Ottaviano, S. & Peretto, A. & Torricelli, N., 2019. "Application and comparison of semi-empirical models for performance prediction of a kW-size reciprocating piston expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 143-156.
    3. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    4. Xinxin Zhang & Yin Zhang & Min Cao & Jingfu Wang & Yuting Wu & Chongfang Ma, 2019. "Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Using Single-Screw Expander," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Giuffrida, Antonio, 2018. "A theoretical study on the performance of a scroll expander in an organic Rankine cycle with hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) in place of R245fa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1172-1180.
    6. T. M. I. Mahlia & H. Syaheed & A. E. Pg Abas & F. Kusumo & A. H. Shamsuddin & Hwai Chyuan Ong & M. R. Bilad, 2019. "Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Applications for Solar Energy: Recent Technological Advances," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Jovell, Daniel & Gonzalez-Olmos, Rafael & Llovell, Fèlix, 2022. "A computational drop-in assessment of hydrofluoroethers in Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    8. Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Pili, Roberto & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2021. "Experimental investigation, model validation and application of twin-screw expanders with different built-in volume ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    9. De Lorenzi, Andrea & Gambarotta, Agostino & Morini, Mirko & Rossi, Michele & Saletti, Costanza, 2020. "Setup and testing of smart controllers for small-scale district heating networks: An integrated framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Carraro, Gianluca & Bori, Viola & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Toniato, Giuseppe & Danieli, Piero, 2020. "Experimental investigation of an innovative biomass-fired micro-ORC system for cogeneration applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1226-1243.
    11. Yıldız Koç, 2019. "Parametric Optimisation of an ORC in a Wood Chipboard Production Facility to Recover Waste Heat Produced from the Drying and Steam Production Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Andrés Meana-Fernández & Juan M. González-Caballín & Roberto Martínez-Pérez & Francisco J. Rubio-Serrano & Antonio J. Gutiérrez-Trashorras, 2022. "Power Plant Cycles: Evolution towards More Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    13. de M. Ventura, Carlos A. & Rowlands, Andrew S., 2015. "Recuperated power cycle analysis model: Investigation and optimisation of low-to-moderate resource temperature Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 484-494.
    14. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Schifflechner, Christopher & Niederdränk, Anne & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Wieland, Christoph, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of an ORC-CHP architecture based on regenerative preheating for geothermal applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    15. Piotr Kolasiński, 2020. "The Method of the Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Systems Employing Volumetric Expanders," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    16. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    17. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    18. Nicola Casari & Ettore Fadiga & Michele Pinelli & Saverio Randi & Alessio Suman, 2019. "Pressure Pulsation and Cavitation Phenomena in a Micro-ORC System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Palagi, Laura & Sciubba, Enrico & Tocci, Lorenzo, 2019. "A neural network approach to the combined multi-objective optimization of the thermodynamic cycle and the radial inflow turbine for Organic Rankine cycle applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 210-226.
    20. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Rieger, Florian & Schuster, Andreas & Aumann, Richard & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Experimental and numerical investigation of direct liquid injection into an ORC twin-screw expander," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 867-878.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:206:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220312810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.