IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v291y2024ics0378377423004857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating reference crop evapotranspiration using optimized empirical methods with a novel improved Grey Wolf Algorithm in four climatic regions of China

Author

Listed:
  • Dong, Juan
  • Xing, Liwen
  • Cui, Ningbo
  • Guo, Li
  • Liang, Chuan
  • Zhao, Lu
  • Wang, Zhihui
  • Gong, Daozhi

Abstract

Accurate estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) is crucial for agricultural water management. As the simplified alternatives of the Penman-Monteith equation, empirical methods have been widely recommended worldwide. However, its application is still limited to parameters localization varied with geographical and climatic conditions, therefore developing an excellent optimization algorithm for calibrating parameters is very necessary. Regarding the above requirement, the present study developed a novel improved Grey Wolf Algorithm (MDSL-GWA) to optimize the most recommended ones among three types of ETo methods. After the optimization performance comparison among Least Square Method (LSM), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Grey Wolf Algorithm (GWA), and MDSL-GWA in four climatic regions of China, this study found that the Priestley-Taylor (PT) method was the best radiation-based (Rn-based) method and achieved better performance in temperate continental region (TCR), mountain plateau region (MPR), and temperate monsoon region (TMR) than other types. While the temperature-based (T-based) Hargreaves-Samani (HS) method performed best in subtropical monsoon region (SMR), further attaching better performance among the same type in TMR and TCR, while the Oudin method was the best T-based method in MPR. Moreover, the Romanenko method was better humidity-based (RH-based) in TCR and MPR, whereas the Brockamp-Wenner method exhibited higher in SMR and TMR. Furthermore, despite intelligence optimization algorithms significantly enhancing original ETo methods, the MDSL-GWA achieved best performance and outperformed other algorithms by 4.5–29.6% in determination coefficient (R2), 4.7–27.3% in nash-sutcliffe efficient (NSE), 3.7–44.4% in relative root mean square error (RRMSE), and 3.1–56.2% in mean absolute error (MAE), respectively. After optimization, the MDSL-GWA-PT was the most recommended ETo method in TMR, TCR, and MPR, and the median values of R2, NSE, RRMSE, and MAE ranged 0.907–0.958, 0.887–0.925, 0.083–0.103, and 0.115–0.162 mm, respectively. In SMR, the MDSL-GWA-HS produced the best ETo estimates, with median values of R2, NSE, RRMSE, and MAE being 0.876, 0.843, 0.112, and 0.146 mm, respectively. In summary, this study recommended the best ETo method and algorithms using accessible data in four climatic regions of China, which is helpful for decision-making in effective management and utilization of regional agricultural water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong, Juan & Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo & Guo, Li & Liang, Chuan & Zhao, Lu & Wang, Zhihui & Gong, Daozhi, 2024. "Estimating reference crop evapotranspiration using optimized empirical methods with a novel improved Grey Wolf Algorithm in four climatic regions of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:291:y:2024:i:c:s0378377423004857
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423004857
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shirmohammadi-Aliakbarkhani, Zahra & Saberali, Seyed Farhad, 2020. "Evaluating of eight evapotranspiration estimation methods in arid regions of Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Xing, Liwen & Zhao, Lu & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Guo, Li & Du, Taisheng & Wu, Zongjun & Gong, Daozhi & Jiang, Shouzheng, 2023. "Apple tree transpiration estimated using the Penman-Monteith model integrated with optimized jarvis model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Prasanth, Sikakollu & Singh, Uttam & Kumar, Arun & Tikkiwal, Vinay Anand & Chong, Peter H.J., 2021. "Forecasting spread of COVID-19 using google trends: A hybrid GWO-deep learning approach," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Lu, Yingjie & Li, Tao & Hu, Hui & Zeng, Xuemei, 2023. "Short-term prediction of reference crop evapotranspiration based on machine learning with different decomposition methods in arid areas of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    5. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S. & Almorox, J. & Darouich, H., 2020. "Reference grass evapotranspiration with reduced data sets: Parameterization of the FAO Penman-Monteith temperature approach and the Hargeaves-Samani equation using local climatic variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Valipour, Mohammad & Gholami Sefidkouhi, Mohammad Ali & Raeini−Sarjaz, Mahmoud, 2017. "Selecting the best model to estimate potential evapotranspiration with respect to climate change and magnitudes of extreme events," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 50-60.
    7. Ferreira, Lucas Borges & da Cunha, Fernando França, 2020. "New approach to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration based on hourly temperature and relative humidity using machine learning and deep learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    8. Zhang, Lei & Zhao, Xin & Zhu, Ge & He, Jun & Chen, Jian & Chen, Zhicheng & Traore, Seydou & Liu, Junguo & Singh, Vijay P., 2023. "Short-term daily reference evapotranspiration forecasting using temperature-based deep learning models in different climate zones in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    9. Rohwer, Carl, 1931. "Evaporation from Free Water Surfaces," Technical Bulletins 163103, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2015. "Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1869-1880.
    11. Di Nunno, Fabio & Granata, Francesco, 2023. "Future trends of reference evapotranspiration in Sicily based on CORDEX data and Machine Learning algorithms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    12. Su, Qiong & Singh, Vijay P. & Karthikeyan, Raghupathy, 2022. "Improved reference evapotranspiration methods for regional irrigation water demand estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    13. Valipour, Mohammad & Khoshkam, Helaleh & Bateni, Sayed M. & Jun, Changhyun & Band, Shahab S., 2023. "Hybrid machine learning and deep learning models for multi-step-ahead daily reference evapotranspiration forecasting in different climate regions across the contiguous United States," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    14. Zhang, Nan & Feng, Chen & Shan, Yahui & Sun, Na & Xue, Xiaoming & Shi, Liping, 2023. "A universal stability quantification method for grid-connected hydropower plant considering FOPI controller and complex nonlinear characteristics based on improved GWO," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 874-894.
    15. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
    16. Yang, Yong & Chen, Rensheng & Han, Chuntan & Liu, Zhangwen, 2021. "Evaluation of 18 models for calculating potential evapotranspiration in different climatic zones of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    17. Kim, Ho-Jun & Chandrasekara, Sewwandhi & Kwon, Hyun-Han & Lima, Carlos & Kim, Tae-woong, 2023. "A novel multi-scale parameter estimation approach to the Hargreaves-Samani equation for estimation of Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    18. He, Guohua & Geng, Chenfan & Zhao, Yong & Wang, Jianhua & Jiang, Shan & Zhu, Yongnan & Wang, Qingming & Wang, Lizhen & Mu, Xing, 2021. "Food habit and climate change impacts on agricultural water security during the peak population period in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    19. Haghverdi, Amir & Singh, Amninder & Sapkota, Anish & Reiter, Maggie & Ghodsi, Somayeh, 2021. "Developing irrigation water conservation strategies for hybrid bermudagrass using an evapotranspiration-based smart irrigation controller in inland southern California," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    20. Liu, Xiaoying & Xu, Chunying & Zhong, Xiuli & Li, Yuzhong & Yuan, Xiaohuan & Cao, Jingfeng, 2017. "Comparison of 16 models for reference crop evapotranspiration against weighing lysimeter measurement," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 145-155.
    21. Graham, Scott L. & Kochendorfer, John & McMillan, Andrew M.S. & Duncan, Maurice J. & Srinivasan, M.S. & Hertzog, Gladys, 2016. "Effects of agricultural management on measurements, prediction, and partitioning of evapotranspiration in irrigated grasslands," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 340-347.
    22. Yang, Yang & Luo, Yufeng & Wu, Conglin & Zheng, Hezhen & Zhang, Lei & Cui, Yuanlai & Sun, Ningning & Wang, Li, 2019. "Evaluation of six equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimating using public weather forecast message for different climate regions across China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 386-399.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Juan & Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo & Zhao, Lu & Guo, Li & Wang, Zhihui & Du, Taisheng & Tan, Mingdong & Gong, Daozhi, 2024. "Estimating reference crop evapotranspiration using improved convolutional bidirectional long short-term memory network by multi-head attention mechanism in the four climatic zones of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Su, Qiong & Singh, Vijay P. & Karthikeyan, Raghupathy, 2022. "Improved reference evapotranspiration methods for regional irrigation water demand estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    4. Kim, Ho-Jun & Chandrasekara, Sewwandhi & Kwon, Hyun-Han & Lima, Carlos & Kim, Tae-woong, 2023. "A novel multi-scale parameter estimation approach to the Hargreaves-Samani equation for estimation of Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    5. Jamil, Basharat & Akhtar, Naiem, 2017. "Comparison of empirical models to estimate monthly mean diffuse solar radiation from measured data: Case study for humid-subtropical climatic region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1326-1342.
    6. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Ma, Xin & Bai, Hua, 2019. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily and monthly mean daily diffuse horizontal solar radiation for different climatic regions of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 168-186.
    7. Kang, Yan & Chen, Peiru & Cheng, Xiao & Zhang, Shuo & Song, Songbai, 2022. "Novel hybrid machine learning framework with decomposition–transformation and identification of key modes for estimating reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    8. Qin, Shujing & Liu, Zhihe & Qiu, Rangjian & Luo, Yufeng & Wu, Jingwei & Zhang, Baozhong & Wu, Lifeng & Agathokleous, Evgenios, 2023. "Short–term global solar radiation forecasting based on an improved method for sunshine duration prediction and public weather forecasts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    9. Li, Danny H.W. & Aghimien, Emmanuel I. & Tsang, Ernest K.W., 2022. "Application of artificial neural networks in horizontal luminous efficacy modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 864-878.
    10. Zang, Haixiang & Cheng, Lilin & Ding, Tao & Cheung, Kwok W. & Wang, Miaomiao & Wei, Zhinong & Sun, Guoqiang, 2020. "Application of functional deep belief network for estimating daily global solar radiation: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Zhang, Lei & Zhao, Xin & Zhu, Ge & He, Jun & Chen, Jian & Chen, Zhicheng & Traore, Seydou & Liu, Junguo & Singh, Vijay P., 2023. "Short-term daily reference evapotranspiration forecasting using temperature-based deep learning models in different climate zones in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    12. Yang, Yong & Chen, Rensheng & Han, Chuntan & Liu, Zhangwen, 2021. "Evaluation of 18 models for calculating potential evapotranspiration in different climatic zones of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    13. Makade, Rahul G. & Chakrabarti, Siddharth & Jamil, Basharat & Sakhale, C.N., 2020. "Estimation of global solar radiation for the tropical wet climatic region of India: A theory of experimentation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2044-2059.
    14. Hwang, Eunju, 2022. "Prediction intervals of the COVID-19 cases by HAR models with growth rates and vaccination rates in top eight affected countries: Bootstrap improvement," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Xueping Zhu & Chi Zhang & Guangtao Fu & Yu Li & Wei Ding, 2017. "Bi-Level Optimization for Determining Operating Strategies for Inter-Basin Water Transfer-Supply Reservoirs," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(14), pages 4415-4432, November.
    16. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    17. Lu, Yunbo & Wang, Lunche & Zhu, Canming & Zou, Ling & Zhang, Ming & Feng, Lan & Cao, Qian, 2023. "Predicting surface solar radiation using a hybrid radiative Transfer–Machine learning model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Liu, Yanfeng & Zhou, Yong & Chen, Yaowen & Wang, Dengjia & Wang, Yingying & Zhu, Ying, 2020. "Comparison of support vector machine and copula-based nonlinear quantile regression for estimating the daily diffuse solar radiation: A case study in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1101-1112.
    19. Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Najeebullah Khan & Mohd Khairul Idlan Muhammad & Shamsuddin Shahid, 2022. "Ranking of Empirical Evapotranspiration Models in Different Climate Zones of Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Fabio Di Nunno & Marco De Matteo & Giovanni Izzo & Francesco Granata, 2023. "A Combined Clustering and Trends Analysis Approach for Characterizing Reference Evapotranspiration in Veneto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:291:y:2024:i:c:s0378377423004857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.