IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/csy/journl/v2y2011i1p07-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cosmopolitan Epics of 2004: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Assoc. Prof. Saverio Giovacchini

    (History Department, University of Maryland)

Abstract

In 2004 Hollywood produced three purportedly blockbuster epic films: Troy, King Arthur and Alexander. Many critics suggested a direct link between the 1950s “sword and sandal” epic and this new crop of movies. Similarities between the two cycles certainly exist but in this essay I want to emphasize a crucial difference between the contemporary, cosmopolitan, epic and the previous, more nation-bound, 1950s cycle. Rather than being in tune with key elements of American foreign policy, the new cycle of “sword and sandal” films offers a somber assessment of American imperial adventures. I shall contend, in fact, that the new crop of epic films had to choose between two generic conventions that are, at present, not compatible. On the one hand, epic films had traditionally been the bearers of the foreign policy vision of the country that produced them. On the other, their inflated budgets made them dependent on an international market. Deeply aware of a globalized and rising opposition to US foreign policy and of the fact that foreign box office now exceeds the domestic take of a blockbuster, it may be no wonder that the makers of these films chose to craft them into citizens of the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Assoc. Prof. Saverio Giovacchini, 2011. "The Cosmopolitan Epics of 2004: A Case Study," Journal of Global Analysis, Centre for Strategic Research and Analysis, vol. 2(1), pages 07-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:csy:journl:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:07-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cesran.org/dergi.php?id=25
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Iraq War; Blockbuster cinema; American Foreign Policy; Anti-Americanism.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csy:journl:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:07-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Özgür Tüfekçi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesratr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.