IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2020i22p85-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Esg Marketing Model: A New Paradigm To Understand The Impact

Author

Listed:
  • Vicentiu Cosmin VLAD

    (Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania)

  • Florin-Alexandru LUCA

    (Technical University “Gheorghe Asachi” of Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Sustainability and impact are major topics in the front pages of media and daily discussions. As a result of this media coverage new sets of consumer’s purchasing habits are pushing companies and providers to align their products and services to sustainability and impact principles. The scope of this article is to propose a new model in order to understand the impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Marketing on the consumer’s patterns and choices. ESG Marketing is considered the independent variable whereas Consumer’s Purchase Intention is the dependent variable in the model. ESG Marketing is composed by five dimensions: environmental belief, social belief, governance belief, ESG advertising and ESG branding. The authors’ control variables are demographic features - age, gender, education, occupation and income. The model is a perfect tool to run quantitative analysis taking into consideration its variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicentiu Cosmin VLAD & Florin-Alexandru LUCA, 2020. "Esg Marketing Model: A New Paradigm To Understand The Impact," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 22, pages 85-89, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2020:i:22:p:85-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_22_10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joya A. Kemper & C. Michael Hall & Paul W. Ballantine, 2019. "Marketing and Sustainability: Business as Usual or Changing Worldviews?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Dominika Moravcikova & Anna Krizanova & Jana Kliestikova & Martina Rypakova, 2017. "Green Marketing as the Source of the Competitive Advantage of the Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Florin-Alexandru Luca & Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu & Andreia Gabriela Andrei & Adrian V. Horodnic, 2018. "Raising Awareness on Health Impact of the Chemicals Used in Consumer Products: Empirical Evidence from East-Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judit OLÁH & Tamás HARMAN & József POPP, 2018. "Optimal Distribution Between Box And Pallet Automatic Warehouse Storage," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 199-210, September.
    2. Pavol KRAL & Katarina JANOSKOVA & Tomas KLIESTIK, 2018. "Key Determinants Of The Public Transport User’S Satisfaction," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(31), pages 36-51, December.
    3. Youtang Zhang & Hagos Mesfin Berhe, 2022. "The Impact of Green Investment and Green Marketing on Business Performance: The Mediation Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Ethiopia’s Chinese Textile Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Podhorska Ivana & Valaskova Katarina & Stehel Vojtech & Kliestik Tomas, 2019. "Possibility of Company Goodwill Valuation: Verification in Slovak and Czech Republic," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(3), pages 338-356, September.
    5. Eijaz Ahmed Khan & Pradip Royhan & M. Ashiqur Rahman & Mohammed Mizanur Rahman & Ahmed Mostafa, 2019. "The Impact of Enviropreneurial Orientation on Small Firms’ Business Performance: The Mediation of Green Marketing Mix and Eco-Labeling Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Natural Environment Protection Strategies and Green Management Style: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Margareta Nadanyiova & Lubica Gajanova & Jana Majerova, 2020. "Green Marketing as a Part of the Socially Responsible Brand’s Communication from the Aspect of Generational Stratification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Satalkina Liliya & Shpak Nestor, 2018. "Evaluation of the Influence of the Macro-environment on the Social Innovation Activity of Enterprises," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(1), pages 36-48, February.
    9. Erick Kauffmann & Jesús Peral & David Gil & Antonio Ferrández & Ricardo Sellers & Higinio Mora, 2019. "Managing Marketing Decision-Making with Sentiment Analysis: An Evaluation of the Main Product Features Using Text Data Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-19, August.
    10. S. M. Shafiul Alam & K. M. Zahidul Islam, 2021. "Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Bruno Dyck & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2021. "Sustainable marketing based on virtue ethics: addressing socio-ecological challenges facing humankind," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 115-132, June.
    12. Tai Abdulrahman Alshammari & Khalid Mhasan Alshammary & Fahad Maiyah Alshammari, 2022. "Green Product and Process Innovation, Corporate Environmental Ethics and Competitive Advantages among Manufacturing Firms in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 14(2), pages 51-61.
    13. Ishtiaq Ahmad & Judit Oláh & József Popp & Domicián Máté, 2018. "Does Business Group Affiliation Matter for Superior Performance? Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Md. Nekmahmud & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 2020. "Why Not Green Marketing? Determinates of Consumers’ Intention to Green Purchase Decision in a New Developing Nation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-31, September.
    15. József Popp & Judit Oláh & Mária Farkas Fekete & Zoltán Lakner & Domicián Máté, 2018. "The Relationship Between Prices of Various Metals, Oil and Scarcity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska, 2023. "Sustainability in the Development of Green Organizations Based on the Example of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Kirtika Deo & Abhnil Amtesh Prasad, 2022. "Exploring Climate Change Adaptation, Mitigation and Marketing Connections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    18. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:60 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Magdalena Kowalska, 2020. "SME Managers’ Perceptions of Sustainable Marketing Mix in Different Socioeconomic Conditions—A Comparative Analysis of Sri Lanka and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Alan Kabanshi, 2020. "Are We Overestimating the Benefits of Emission Reduction Measures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-9, January.
    21. Gheorghe Epuran & Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu & Adrian V. Horodnic & Gheorghe Epuran & Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu & Adrian V. Horodnic, 2019. "Green Jobs Creation – Main Element in the Implementation of Bioeconomic Mechanisms," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-60, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental; Social; Governance; Green; Sustainable; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2020:i:22:p:85-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.