Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Ecuador, as of July 2014

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Ecuador, there are 18 authors affiliated with 13 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Top 25% institutions in Ecuador

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO)

Quito, Ecuador

2[2]Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad de las Americas

Quito, Ecuador

3[3]Banco Central del Ecuador

Quito, Ecuador


Top 25% authors in Ecuador

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
1[1]Hessel Oosterbeek

Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO), Quito

2[3]Simon Cueva

Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad de las Americas, Quito

3[4]Roberto Mosquera

Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Universidad de las Americas, Quito

4[5]Fabrizio Noboa


The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.


We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.