Top 10% Institutions and Economists in the Field of China, as of March 2012
This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the
RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on
EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by
RePEc, citation analysis performed by
CitEc and popularity data compiled by
LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click
here. Or see the
ranking FAQ.
For China, these are 265 authors affiliated with 619 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.
Top 10% institutions in the field of China
The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in
NEP that have also been announced in
NEP-CNA (China).
Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.76 | World Bank Group, Washington |
2 | 1.79 | Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
(3) | 3.75 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
3 | 4.15 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
4 | 5.64 | Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles |
(5) | 5.97 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
5 | 6.57 | RAND, Santa Monica |
6 | 10.47 | Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel |
7 | 10.74 | Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
8 | 11.63 | Department of Economics, University of Sussex, Brighton |
9 | 12.32 | Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam |
10 | 13.36 | Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn |
11 | 13.44 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
12 | 13.82 | Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis |
(13) | 14.21 | Institut für Finanzwissenschaft, Fakultät für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck |
13 | 14.21 | Fakultät für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck |
14 | 14.36 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
15 | 15.77 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam |
(16) | 15.9 | Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
16 | 16.29 | Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn |
(16) | 16.29 | Bonn Graduate School of Economics, Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn |
17 | 16.34 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(18) | 18.77 | Econometrisch Instituut, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam |
18 | 20.38 | Department of Economics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin |
19 | 20.52 | Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
20 | 21.45 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
21 | 23.7 | Department of Food and Resource Economics, Korea University, Seoul |
(22) | 25.55 | Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
22 | 25.89 | Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin |
(23) | 27.33 | Research School of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
23 | 27.33 | College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
24 | 28.51 | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington |
25 | 29.38 | Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto |
26 | 30.63 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
(27) | 30.84 | Aid Effectiveness Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
27 | 33.75 | Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing |
28 | 33.92 | Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz |
29 | 35.69 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
(30) | 38 | Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
30 | 38.84 | School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing |
31 | 39.34 | Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington |
(32) | 40.2 | Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
32 | 40.83 | Ministry of Finance, Government of Bulgaria, Sofia |
33 | 44.16 | School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham |
(34) | 44.54 | Centre for the Study of International Economic Relations (CSIER), Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
34 | 46.97 | Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto |
35 | 47.51 | Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
36 | 50.44 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
37 | 52.4 | Department of Economics, International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham |
38 | 52.42 | School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton |
39 | 55.46 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
40 | 55.8 | Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini |
(41) | 58.75 | Business Economics, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto |
(41) | 59.4 | Macroeconomics and Growth Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
41 | 63.26 | Business School, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Kowloon |
(41) | 63.26 | Department of Economics, Business School, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Kowloon |
(42) | 63.55 | Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy, School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham |
42 | 65.56 | Paris School of Economics, Paris |
43 | 65.79 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford |
44 | 67.22 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
45 | 67.92 | School of Economics and Business Administration, Beijing Normal University, Beijing |
46 | 68.09 | Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel |
47 | 68.88 | Graduate School of Business, DePaul University, Chicago |
48 | 70.07 | Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel |
(49) | 70.08 | Department of Economics, Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
49 | 70.08 | Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
50 | 70.17 | Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
51 | 70.34 | Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca |
52 | 72.46 | Center for Agricutural and Rural Development (CARD), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou |
53 | 72.67 | Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm |
54 | 73.01 | Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London |
(55) | 73.8 | Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
(55) | 74.41 | Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
55 | 74.41 | Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
56 | 74.83 | Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Brisbane |
57 | 76.3 | CESifo, München |
58 | 79.49 | Brookings Institution, Washington |
59 | 81.34 | Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston |
60 | 82.91 | Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris |
61 | 83.06 | Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton |
Top 10% authors in the field of China
This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the
RePEc Author Service.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
- Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia, Spain.
- Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
- Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
- Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
- RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.
We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.