Top 10% Institutions and Economists in the Field of China, as of February 2012
This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the
RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on
EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by
RePEc, citation analysis performed by
CitEc and popularity data compiled by
LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click
here. Or see the
ranking FAQ.
For China, these are 266 authors affiliated with 614 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.
Top 10% institutions in the field of China
The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in
NEP that have also been announced in
NEP-CNA (China).
| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.64 | World Bank Group, Washington |
2 | 1.92 | Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
(3) | 3.83 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
3 | 5.02 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
4 | 5.4 | Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn |
5 | 5.56 | Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles |
6 | 6.76 | RAND, Santa Monica |
(7) | 6.91 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
7 | 10.63 | Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel |
8 | 11.51 | Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
9 | 11.61 | Department of Economics, University of Sussex, Brighton |
10 | 12.03 | Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam |
11 | 13.75 | Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis |
12 | 14.23 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
(13) | 14.56 | Institut für Finanzwissenschaft, Fakultät für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck |
13 | 14.56 | Fakultät für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck |
14 | 15.52 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
15 | 15.62 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam |
16 | 16.63 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(17) | 17.33 | Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
17 | 18.04 | Department of Economics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin |
(18) | 18.96 | Econometrisch Instituut, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam |
18 | 20.18 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
19 | 21.21 | Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
20 | 23.4 | Department of Food and Resource Economics, Korea University, Seoul |
(21) | 24.65 | Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
21 | 24.7 | Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin |
22 | 27.07 | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington |
(23) | 27.52 | Research School of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
23 | 27.52 | College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
24 | 27.78 | Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto |
(25) | 28.11 | Aid Effectiveness Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
25 | 28.11 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
26 | 32.28 | Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing |
27 | 32.8 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
(28) | 34.25 | Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
28 | 35.13 | Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz |
29 | 36.73 | Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington |
30 | 37.65 | School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing |
(31) | 38.37 | Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
31 | 39.25 | Ministry of Finance, Government of Bulgaria, Sofia |
32 | 42.52 | Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel |
33 | 42.91 | School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham |
34 | 44.58 | Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
35 | 45.33 | Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto |
(36) | 46.59 | Economic Policy Research Institute (EPRI), Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
(36) | 46.59 | Centre for the Study of International Economic Relations (CSIER), Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
36 | 48.04 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
37 | 49.56 | Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini |
38 | 50.54 | Department of Economics, International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham |
39 | 50.64 | School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton |
40 | 51.78 | School of Economics and Business Administration, Beijing Normal University, Beijing |
41 | 52.8 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
(42) | 57.69 | Business Economics, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto |
(42) | 57.88 | Macroeconomics and Growth Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
42 | 61.64 | Business School, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Kowloon |
(42) | 61.64 | Department of Economics, Business School, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Kowloon |
(43) | 62.03 | Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy, School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham |
43 | 62.45 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford |
44 | 63.61 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
45 | 63.88 | Paris School of Economics, Paris |
46 | 68.29 | Graduate School of Business, DePaul University, Chicago |
(47) | 68.46 | Department of Economics, Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
47 | 68.46 | Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
48 | 68.89 | Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel |
49 | 69.98 | Center for Agricutural and Rural Development (CARD), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou |
50 | 70.05 | Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
51 | 71.37 | Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London |
(52) | 71.75 | Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
(52) | 72.95 | Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
52 | 72.95 | Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
53 | 76.55 | CESifo, München |
54 | 76.77 | Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm |
55 | 79.47 | Brookings Institution, Washington |
56 | 79.83 | Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston |
57 | 80.25 | Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton |
58 | 82.3 | Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca |
59 | 82.58 | Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris |
60 | 82.89 | Department of Applied Economics, College of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-St. Paul, St. Paul |
61 | 83.09 | Business School, University of Western Australia, Perth |
Top 10% authors in the field of China
This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the
RePEc Author Service.
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
- Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia, Spain.
- Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
- Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
- Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
- RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.
We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.
