Field Rankings at IDEAS: Resource Economics

Click here to visit St. Louis Fed Research

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 10% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Resource Economics, as of May 2011

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Resource Economics, these are 125 authors affiliated with 453 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 10% institutions in the field of Resource Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-RES (Resource Economics).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.12	Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2	2.09	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)	3.1	Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
3	4.61	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
4	5.35	Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(5)	5.94	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(5)	9.4	Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(5)	9.77	School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
5	9.77	Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
6	10.23	School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane
7	10.74	Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
8	10.83	Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(9)	11.35	Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane
9	11.7	Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
(10)	12.85	Nationalekonomiska institutionen, Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
10	13.53	Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
11	14.97	Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
12	16.39	Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
(13)	17.04	Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
13	21.17	Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
14	21.44	Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
15	23.74	Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
16	25.66	Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
17	25.93	Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
(18)	26.28	Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
18	26.28	College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
19	26.32	Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington
(20)	28.02	Department of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
20	28.87	CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
21	33.13	Department of Economics, University of California-Riverside, Riverside
22	34.06	Rimini Center for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini
(23)	34.49	Environmental Economics Unit, Nationalekonomiska institutionen, Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
23	34.84	Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
24	37.61	Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University, Canberra
25	37.67	Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
(26)	40.08	Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencia Económicas y Administrativas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago
26	40.08	Facultad de Ciencia Económicas y Administrativas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago
27	40.23	American Enterprise Institute, Washington
28	41.9	Carol Martin Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington
(29)	42.99	Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource-Rich Economies (OxCarre), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
29	43.57	Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
30	44.46	Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
31	48.25	Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
32	50.14	Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Stockholm
33	50.2	Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford
34	50.59	Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
35	50.89	Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
36	50.93	London School of Economics (LSE), London
37	51.75	Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
38	52.54	Banco Central de Chile, Santiago
(39)	52.71	Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
39	52.71	Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
40	54.18	Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
41	54.37	Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
42	54.88	Economics Department, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
(43)	55.28	Centre for Climate Economics and Policy (CCEP), Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University, Canberra
(43)	55.39	Department of Economics, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
43	55.39	W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe
44	55.71	Department of Economics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin
(45)	56.24	Economic Analysis & Policy Group (EAP), Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
45	57.22	School of Public Affairs, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles

Top 10% authors in the field of Resource Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	1.43	Peter Nijkamp
2.	1.66	Jeffrey Alexander Frankel
3.	3.05	C. Knox Lovell
4.	4.02	William A. Brock
5.	5.37	Robert Norman Stavins
6.	6.91	Anastasios Xepapadeas
7.	7.54	Fredrik Carlsson
8.	8.41	Ramon Lopez
9.	9.24	Elinor Ostrom
10.	9.45	Gordon C. Rausser
11.	10.5	Thomas Nils Samuel Sterner
12.	12.16	Juan-Pablo Montero

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.