RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 25% Think Tanks, as of August 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Think Tanks, these are 128 institutions. Institutions need satisfy the following criteria to be included: Institutions listed as think tank on EDIRC.
All institutions in this category.

Top 25% Think Tanks

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreInstitution
11.13National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA)
22.8Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
33.31Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London, United Kingdom
44.19Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany
54.95Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
65.24ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V., München, Germany
75.32DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin, Germany
85.59Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden
97.9Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
1010.83Rimini Center for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini, Italy
1111.76American Enterprise Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
1214.06Centre d'études prospectives et d'informations internationales (CEPII), Paris, France
1314.23Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin, Ireland
1414.58Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Tokyo, Japan
1514.88Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
1615.81Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow, Russia
1716.36Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), San Francisco, California (USA)
1816.66W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan (USA)
1917.64Bruegel, Bruxelles/Brussel, Belgium
2018.14Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen, Germany
2121.61Motu: Economic & Public Policy Research, Wellington, New Zealand
2223.21EIM Business & Policy Research, Zoetermeer, Netherlands
2323.59Urban Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
2423.63Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg, Germany
2525.01C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto, Canada
2625.51Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York (USA)
2726.48Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), México, Mexico
2827.29Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies (JIMS), Jerusalem, Israel
2927.35Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus (VATT), Government of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
3027.87Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
3129.17Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos (ETLA), Helsinki, Finland
3229.36The Conference Board, New York City, New York (USA)

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.