RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 25% Think Tanks, as of July 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Think Tanks, these are 126 institutions. Institutions need satisfy the following criteria to be included: Institutions listed as think tank on EDIRC.
All institutions in this category.

Top 25% Think Tanks

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreInstitution
11.08National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA)
22.77Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
33.53Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London, United Kingdom
44.19Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany
54.9Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
65.16ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V., München, Germany
75.42Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden
85.53DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin, Germany
97.99Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
1010.86Rimini Center for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini, Italy
1111.71American Enterprise Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
1213.7Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow, Russia
1313.91Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin, Ireland
1414.08Centre d'études prospectives et d'informations internationales (CEPII), Paris, France
1514.34Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
1616.16Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), San Francisco, California (USA)
1716.87W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan (USA)
1817.53Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Tokyo, Japan
1917.94Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen, Germany
2019.47Bruegel, Bruxelles/Brussel, Belgium
2121.43Motu: Economic & Public Policy Research, Wellington, New Zealand
2223.22EIM Business & Policy Research, Zoetermeer, Netherlands
2323.67Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg, Germany
2423.9Urban Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
2524.87C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto, Canada
2625.84Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York (USA)
2726.4Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), México, Mexico
2826.84The Conference Board, New York City, New York (USA)
2927.15Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies (JIMS), Jerusalem, Israel
3027.42Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus (VATT), Government of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
3128.1Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.