RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Taiwan, as of April 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Taiwan, there are 70 authors affiliated with 32 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to a formula.

All institutions in this region.

Top 25% institutions in Taiwan

RankScoreW.RankInstitution
11.14[1]Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei
21.71[2]Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
33.2[3]Department of Finance, National Taiwan University, Taipei
44.78[4]Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, Taipei
55.87[5]Department of Economics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu
65.89[6]College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taichung
77.2[7]Department of Finance, Providence University, Taichung
89.33[9]Department of International Trade, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung-Li

Top 25% authors in Taiwan

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in
EDIRC.
RankScoreW.RankAuthorAffiliated with (in this region)
1.1.89[2]Chung-Ming Kuan Department of Finance, National Taiwan University, Taipei
2.2.25[1]Ray Yeutien Chou Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei
3.4.42[4]Kamhon Kan Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei
4.4.48[3]Been-Lon Chen Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei
5.4.5[5]Yiting Li Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
6.5.14[6]Kong-Pin Chen Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
7.5.71[7]Shiu-Sheng Chen Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
8.6.21[8]Daigee Shaw Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei
Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, Taipei
9.8.04[9]Juin-jen Chang Academia Sinica
10.10.61[10]Hung-Jen Wang Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
11.10.98[12]Shin-Kun Peng Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei
12.11.26[11]Wen-Jen Tsay Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei
13.11.79[13]Angus C. Chu Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei
14.13.71[14]Hung-Ju Chen Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
15.14.55[16]Joseph Tao-yi Wang Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
16.15.92[15]Ming-Jen Lin Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
17.16.89[17]Min-Teh Yu Department of Finance, Providence University, Taichung

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.