RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 10% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Neuroeconomics, as of March 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Neuroeconomics, these are 44 authors affiliated with 242 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 10% institutions in the field of Neuroeconomics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-NEU (Neuroeconomics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.16Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim
23.4Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research (CeGE), Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
23.4Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
44.3Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
55.06Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
65.58Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
76.44Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER), Osaka University, Osaka
87.64CRC "Armut, Ungleichheit und Wachstum in Entwicklungsländern", Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
99.3Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1011.33Volkswirtschaftliches Seminar, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
1111.52Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1211.88College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando
1313.2Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
1413.86CESifo, München
1517.33Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
(15)17.33Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
(16)17.7Institute for Public Economics, Department of Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton
1617.7Department of Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton
1718.4Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
1819.12Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
1920.62Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(20)20.7Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), London
2020.7London School of Economics (LSE), London
2122.88Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
2224.08College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie
(22)24.08Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie
2324.38Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex, Colchester
(23)24.38European Centre for Analysis in the Social Sciences (ECASS), Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex, Colchester
2424.69World Bank Group, Washington

Top 10% authors in the field of Neuroeconomics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.37Shinsuke Ikeda
2.3.04Melville McMillan
3.3.54Massimo Egidi
4.3.69Fumio Ohtake

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.