Field Rankings at IDEAS: Experimental Economics

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Experimental Economics, as of December 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Experimental Economics, these are 698 authors affiliated with 918 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Experimental Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-EXP (Experimental Economics).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.03	Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2	2.21	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)	3.23	Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
3	6.21	Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
4	6.38	Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
5	6.89	Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange
6	8.08	Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
7	9.37	Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim
8	10.06	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
9	10.68	School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
10	11.22	Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(11)	12.23	A. Gary Anderson Center for Economic Research (ACER), Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange
11	12.73	Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
(12)	13.06	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
12	13.99	Economics Department, George Mason University, Fairfax
13	16.54	Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
14	16.67	Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
15	16.87	Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
16	17.46	Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
(17)	17.6	Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx), School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
17	17.64	Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
18	21.04	Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
19	23.01	Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
20	23.31	Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
21	24.2	CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
22	26.21	Department of Economics, Indiana University, Bloomington
23	28.12	Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
24	28.27	Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
25	30.81	Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
26	31.43	Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(27)	32.37	School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
27	32.37	Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
(28)	35.18	Laboratorium für experimentelle Wirtschaftsforschung, Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
28	36.77	Economics, University of Texas-Dallas, Dallas
29	36.92	Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Stockholm
30	37.48	Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
31	38.31	Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone
32	38.34	Fakultät für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck
33	38.79	London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
34	39.87	Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
35	40.6	Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
(36)	40.92	Institut für Finanzwissenschaft, Fakultät für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck
36	41.46	School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich
37	42.29	Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette
(37)	42.29	Department of Economics, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette
38	44.65	Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
39	45.22	Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
40	45.43	College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando
(41)	46.95	Economic Science Institute (ESI), Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, Orange
(41)	47.55	Laboratory for Economics Management and Auctions (LEMA), Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
41	47.95	Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
42	48.85	Department of Economics, Florida State University, Tallahassee
43	49.28	Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln
44	49.66	Division of Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
45	50.63	Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge

Top 5% authors in the field of Experimental Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	1.46	Ernst Fehr
2.	1.71	Bruno S. Frey
3.	4.08	John List
4.	4.2	Vernon L. Smith
5.	5.29	Vernon L. Smith
6.	7.64	Charles A. Holt
7.	8.23	Simon Gächter
8.	8.69	John H. Kagel
9.	9.33	Andrew Schotter
10.	10	Gary Charness
11.	10.73	Robert W. Rosenthal †
12.	11.1	Vincent P. Crawford
13.	14.1	Benno Torgler
14.	14.1	James Andreoni
15.	15.63	Klaus M. Schmidt
16.	16.78	Andrew Foster
17.	18.66	John Denis Hey
18.	19.4	Armin Falk
19.	19.9	Reinhard Selten
20.	20.48	Kevin McCabe
21.	21.61	Glenn W. Harrison
22.	22.59	Urs Fischbacher
23.	23.21	Matthias Sutter
24.	23.92	Timothy Cason
25.	24.12	John Duffy
26.	24.63	James Marvin Walker
27.	27.32	Gary E. Bolton
28.	28.09	Charles Noussair
29.	28.82	Magnus Johannesson
30.	30.88	Louis Putterman
31.	33.03	Robert Sugden
32.	34.52	Steffen Huck
33.	35.79	Rosemarie Nagel
34.	37.64	Joel Sobel

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.