| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.2 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
2 | 2.28 | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
(3) | 3.38 | Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
3 | 4.59 | Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington |
4 | 4.86 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
5 | 6.51 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
6 | 7.99 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
(7) | 9.73 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
7 | 10.56 | Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara |
8 | 11.09 | Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
9 | 11.35 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
10 | 13.82 | World Bank Group, Washington |
11 | 15.41 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam |
12 | 16 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
(13) | 17.71 | Econometrisch Instituut, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam |
13 | 20.41 | International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham |
14 | 21.41 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(15) | 22.48 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
15 | 23.57 | Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
(16) | 23.75 | Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign |
16 | 23.75 | College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign |
17 | 24.18 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
18 | 24.64 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
(19) | 25.09 | School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
19 | 25.09 | Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
20 | 25.14 | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington |
21 | 25.77 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
22 | 28.27 | Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary |
22 | 28.27 | Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville |
24 | 29.11 | Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University, Canberra |
(25) | 29.24 | Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
(25) | 29.28 | Laboratoire d'Économie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
25 | 30.32 | Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla |
26 | 30.74 | Department of Economics, New York University, New York City |
27 | 31.28 | Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge |
28 | 31.71 | Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich |
29 | 33.2 | AEI-Brookings Joint Institute for Regulatory Studies, Washington |
30 | 33.96 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin |
31 | 34.85 | Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
32 | 37.71 | Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison |
33 | 38.58 | Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames |
34 | 38.89 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
35 | 40.03 | Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
36 | 40.74 | Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis |
37 | 41.11 | School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane |
(38) | 41.21 | Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
38 | 42.39 | Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington |
39 | 42.43 | ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles |
40 | 44.69 | Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano |
(41) | 46.55 | Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve |
41 | 47.4 | Department of Economics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine |
42 | 48.5 | Economics and Environmental Sciences, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara |
43 | 49.41 | Department of Management, Technology and Economics (D-MTEC), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETHZ), Zürich |
44 | 50.8 | Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville |
45 | 54.21 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
46 | 54.23 | Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford |
47 | 54.46 | School of Management, Yale University, New Haven |
48 | 56.06 | Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, Ames |
49 | 56.42 | Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston |
50 | 56.43 | Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens |
(51) | 59.37 | Department of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens |
51 | 59.6 | Economics Department, Clark University, Worcester |
(52) | 61.24 | Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie |
52 | 61.24 | College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie |
53 | 61.37 | Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone |
54 | 62.75 | Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
