RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cultural Economics, as of December 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Cultural Economics, these are 156 authors affiliated with 457 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cultural Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CUL (Cultural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.54Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.63Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
23.29Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
34.05Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
(3)4.05Econometrisch Instituut, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
(4)4.66Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
46.39Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
56.59Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
69.38Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
79.43Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
810.17Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
911.31Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1012.58Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
1113.97ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
1216.72Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(13)16.76Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
1317.68Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1417.74Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1518.23Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH), Bergen
1623.8Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1724.02Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(17)24.02Department of Economics, Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(18)25.21Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1826.92Department of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham
1927.97School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
(20)28.97Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2028.98School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman
2129.23School of Public Affairs, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
2231.61Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London

Top 5% authors in the field of Cultural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.2.78William R. Johnson
3.4.01Alan Beggs
4.5.39Jean Gabszewicz
5.6.84Charles David Throsby
6.6.87Kathryn Graddy
7.7.01Matthew Aaron Gentzkow

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.