RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Ageing, as of December 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Economics of Ageing, these are 207 authors affiliated with 555 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Ageing

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-AGE (Economics of Ageing).
RankScoreInstitution
11.36RAND, Santa Monica
21.8Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim
33.67Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
44.03Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
55.1Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
65.2Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge
76.48Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
87.94Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
910.36Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1011.24Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
1112.24Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
(12)12.48Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1212.48Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(13)13.41Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (ELS), Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1314.07National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
1416.53Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis
1520.16Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(16)20.56Labor and Population Program, RAND, Santa Monica
1623.23Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
1723.7Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
1824.49Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover
1925.19Centro Studi di Economia e Finanza (CSEF), Napoli
2025.52Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
2126.1Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
2228.19Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
2328.88International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2428.97Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2529.07Center for Retirement Research (CRR), Boston College, Chestnut Hill
(26)33.63ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
2634.88Urban Institute, Washington
2735.08School of Management, Yale University, New Haven

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Ageing

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1James P. Smith
2.2.63Kenneth J. Arrow
3.2.88Robert J. Willis
4.4.86David Bloom
5.5.79Michael D. Hurd
6.6.04David Canning
7.7.37Neil Bruce
8.7.75Edward Whitehouse
9.11.23Andrew Michael Jones
10.11.84Timothy Aaron Waidmann

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.