RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Market Microstructure, as of September 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Market Microstructure, these are 124 authors affiliated with 346 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Market Microstructure

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-MST (Market Microstructure).
RankScoreInstitution
11.81Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham
22.48Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
32.68Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
43.86Center for Research in Econometric Analysis of Time Series (CREATES), Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus
(5)3.93Finance Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
(5)4.46Department of Finance, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
58.24Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
68.32Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
79.16Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
811.34Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
(8)11.34Research and Statistics Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
(9)13.49Bendheim Center for Finance, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
915.12Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
1016.93Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
(11)18.41Centro Sector Público - Sector Privado (SP-SP), IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra, Barcelona
1118.41IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona
1218.6Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1321.15School of Finance and Economics, University of Technology, Sydney
1423.14Economics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing
1523.27Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1624.57Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
1725.4Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston

Top 5% authors in the field of Market Microstructure

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.04Tim Bollerslev
2.2.54Torben G. Andersen
3.4.23Ricardo Lagos
4.5.69Neil Shephard
5.7.03Paolo Pasquariello
6.7.68Ramazan Gencay

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.